2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amenity migrants, animals and ambivalent natures: More-than-human encounters at home in the rural residential estate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wilson's () research on enlivening and depleting encounters with unfamiliar others in spaces of transit is exemplary, building on earlier work by Laurier and Philo (), who explore the political possibilities of “light touch” contact with strangers. Others have attended to unexpected encounters in the home created through the mobility of non‐human others (Gillon, ). The second concerns encounters over distance (Conradson & McKay, ).…”
Section: Mobilising Disorientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wilson's () research on enlivening and depleting encounters with unfamiliar others in spaces of transit is exemplary, building on earlier work by Laurier and Philo (), who explore the political possibilities of “light touch” contact with strangers. Others have attended to unexpected encounters in the home created through the mobility of non‐human others (Gillon, ). The second concerns encounters over distance (Conradson & McKay, ).…”
Section: Mobilising Disorientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viewing homemaking as more-than-human exposes collaboration with, and resistance to, human intentions (see Ginn, 2014; Head and Muir, 2006; Hitchings, 2003). Studies attentive to animals and plants have shown how encounters are filtered through moral classifications of belonging: whether in attachment to companion animals (Power, 2009b) or native animals and plants that are portended to belong in home spaces (Gillon, 2014; Head and Muir, 2006; Power, 2009a); or detachment from ‘uncomfortable’ companions that subvert and disgust (Ginn, 2014). In spite of this human ordering, in practice nonhumans are shown to be ‘creative presences’ (Whatmore, 2002: 35), lively, inventive, and ‘recalcitrant’ (Braun, 2008) to prescribed regimes of belonging.…”
Section: Home Cultures Of Nature and More-than-human Homemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power (2009bPower ( : 1031 discusses the more-than-human home as a 'distributed and processual' achievement between humans, nonhumans, and materials: 'irrevocably bound to the various affordances and capacities of the materials, objects, animals and rhythms that inhabit and shape the house-as-home, as it is to the capacities, rhythms and cultures of the human resident'. At home the cast of actors includes, but is not limited to, 'native' animals (Power, 2009a;Gillon, 2014) and plants (Head and Muir, 2006), and also to things less furry, planty, and plainly obvious: for example, slugs (Ginn, 2014), water (Kaika, 2004), and those that are miniscule and invisible: decaying forces and chemical reactions (Edensor, 2011;Power, 2009b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While it is important to attend critically to the manner in which we, as researchers, represent the empirical realities that we work in and with, it would be a conceptual regression to, for example, throw out the baby of detailed commodity chain and network analysis with the bathwater of (so‐called) partial and static representations that may in some ways be redolent of structuralist political economy. Other research that has adopted a relational, ‘more‐than‐human’ ontology to rural geography topics in Australia over the review period can be found in Gillon () in relation to rural residential developments and Phillips's () discussion of the agronomic and economic significance of bees.…”
Section: Farming and Regional Development In An Era Of Multifunctionamentioning
confidence: 99%