2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ameloblastoma in children and adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
80
1
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
15
80
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Unicystic ameloblastoma is radiologically characterized by a unilocular aspect and it is less aggressive than the solid type, but has the potential for recurrence [2] But in the present case, the pathology had involved the left maxillary sinus which is evident in radiograph. And there is greater rotation of permanent tooth bud than that found with a dentigerous cyst.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unicystic ameloblastoma is radiologically characterized by a unilocular aspect and it is less aggressive than the solid type, but has the potential for recurrence [2] But in the present case, the pathology had involved the left maxillary sinus which is evident in radiograph. And there is greater rotation of permanent tooth bud than that found with a dentigerous cyst.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Bansal et al [3] stated that the occurrence of ameloblastoma was 15.2% (39/256) in patients aged under 18 yrs, similar to Olaitan and Adekeye (14.6%) [8]. The mandible was the most common site of occurrence in all races; 225 (96.6%) tumors were encountered in the mandible and 8 (3.4%) in the maxilla, with an overall mandible:maxilla ratio of 28.1:1 [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, in the study by Zhang et al 4) , 8.1% of the patients were under 11 years old; in Arotiba et al 11) , 7% were under the age of 11. There were no patients under 11years old among the patients reported by Chidzonga et al 8 and Butt et al 10) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%