2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambulatory measurement of ankle kinetics for clinical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences may be attributable to the transformation of coordinate systems, which were necessary to allow comparisons. The CoP estimates agreed well and showed differences that were similar to or smaller than those reported in other studies with the IFS (Liedtke et al, 2007;Faber et al, 2010a;Schepers et al, 2007) or with plantar pressure insoles (Rouhani et al, 2011).…”
Section: Grf and Cop Estimation With The Ifssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These differences may be attributable to the transformation of coordinate systems, which were necessary to allow comparisons. The CoP estimates agreed well and showed differences that were similar to or smaller than those reported in other studies with the IFS (Liedtke et al, 2007;Faber et al, 2010a;Schepers et al, 2007) or with plantar pressure insoles (Rouhani et al, 2011).…”
Section: Grf and Cop Estimation With The Ifssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The differences were smaller than or similar to those reported earlier with the IFS (Liedtke et al, 2007;Schepers et al, 2007;Faber et al, 2010a) and with plantar pressure insoles (an ambulatory system as an alternative to IFS) (Rouhani et al, 2011). Faber et al also reported a 2% under-estimation of the vertical GRF measured with the IFS compared to a force plate (Faber et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Grf and Cop Estimation With The Ifssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final result for F X (k) is given in (20) at the bottom of the next page. Similarly, the Jacobian matrix H(k) = where elements of H(k) are given in (21) at the bottom of the page. Note that the IMU measurements are used to calculate F X (k) and H(k) through (4), (3), (7), and (8).…”
Section: Appendix B Ekf Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike magnetic and ultrasonic sensors, the force sensors are reliable and robust to environmental disturbances and do not have the line-of-sight restriction. The fusions of force and inertial sensors have been used to measure the interaction kinetics between human and environment [21]- [24]. However, the work in [21]- [24] uses the force and inertial sensors to obtain kinetic measurements and none of them uses the force measurements to enhance the pose estimation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%