2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambrosia beetle Premnobius cavipennis (Scolytinae: Ipini) carries highly divergent ascomycotan ambrosia fungus, Afroraffaelea ambrosiae gen. nov. et sp. nov. (Ophiostomatales)

Abstract: 2016-12-23T18:37:48

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the inclusion of ~2,200 more gene regions, the analysis presented here fulfils these requirements and validates their viewpoint. Heeding this advice, we elected to exclude Afroraffaelea ambrosiae from our primary conclusions on domestication as there was no support for its correct position within the Ophiostamatales (similar to when the species was first described (Bateman et al., )). It is possible that the rapid radiation at the base of the Ophiostomatales resulted in a mis‐rooting in our supermatrix analysis, one that would unite the RA and RL clades with increased taxon sampling and a different data set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the inclusion of ~2,200 more gene regions, the analysis presented here fulfils these requirements and validates their viewpoint. Heeding this advice, we elected to exclude Afroraffaelea ambrosiae from our primary conclusions on domestication as there was no support for its correct position within the Ophiostamatales (similar to when the species was first described (Bateman et al., )). It is possible that the rapid radiation at the base of the Ophiostomatales resulted in a mis‐rooting in our supermatrix analysis, one that would unite the RA and RL clades with increased taxon sampling and a different data set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past efforts to definitively reconstruct evolutionary relationships among Ophiostomatales genera have been inconclusive. The inferred phylogenies were often poorly supported, or the relationships among taxa were unstable across studies, with results varying depending on the taxa or loci sampled, and on the phylogenetic methods employed (Bateman et al., ; Dreaden et al., ; Massoumi Alamouti, Tsui, & Breuil, ; Musvuugwa et al., ; Taerum et al., ). Phylogenetic uncertainty makes it difficult to address long‐standing questions regarding the timing and number of domestication events for ambrosial cultivars in the Ophiostomatales (Dreaden et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other clades of ambrosia beetles and fungus-feeding bark beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) have evolved different types of mycangia (Schedl, 1962;Francke-Grosmann, 1967;Bateman et al, 2017;Hulcr & Stelinski, 2017). In some cases, the mycangia are rigid chitinous structures and not flexible, in which case developmental plasticity is unlikely (such as Dendroctonus spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Bateman et al (2016) described a new genus in Ophiostomatales from Premnobius cavipennis ( Scolytinae ; Ipini ), an independently evolved ambrosia beetle lineage largely confined to Africa. Furthermore, ambrosia beetles’ mycosymbionts are not limited to the ascomycetous Ophiostomatales .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%