2010 11th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed C 2010
DOI: 10.1109/snpd.2010.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambiguous Arabic Words Disambiguation

Abstract: In this paper we put forward an unsupervised system WSD-AL for Arabic word disambiguation. We apply some pre-processing steps to texts containing the ambiguous word in the corpus and we extract the most relevant words. Then, we put to use the Context-Matching algorithm that returns a semantic coherence score corresponding to the context of use that is semantically closest to the original sentence. These Contexts are generated using the glosses of the ambiguous word and the corpus. The results found by the prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of these methods cannot be compared directly to our algorithms' results because those methods are for different tasks and their results were generated using different datasets. For that reason, in this comparison, we apply the same experimental data that we have used before in the experimental study of the Genetic algorithm (Menai et al, 2012), Naïve Bayes classifier (Elmougy et al, 2008) and Modified version of the Lesk (Merhben et al, 2009) Methods Score Ant colony algorithm (our approach) 80 % Genetic algorithm 78.9 % Naïve Bayes classifier 76.6 % Modified version of the Lesk 67% The results obtained with the ant colony algorithm corroborate those obtained in previous studies on ACO for WSD in English (Schwab et al, 2011(Schwab et al, , 2012(Schwab et al, , and 2013 even though they are not comparable.…”
Section: E Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of these methods cannot be compared directly to our algorithms' results because those methods are for different tasks and their results were generated using different datasets. For that reason, in this comparison, we apply the same experimental data that we have used before in the experimental study of the Genetic algorithm (Menai et al, 2012), Naïve Bayes classifier (Elmougy et al, 2008) and Modified version of the Lesk (Merhben et al, 2009) Methods Score Ant colony algorithm (our approach) 80 % Genetic algorithm 78.9 % Naïve Bayes classifier 76.6 % Modified version of the Lesk 67% The results obtained with the ant colony algorithm corroborate those obtained in previous studies on ACO for WSD in English (Schwab et al, 2011(Schwab et al, , 2012(Schwab et al, , and 2013 even though they are not comparable.…”
Section: E Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some works applied to Arabic. We can state the unsupervised approach of Bootstrapping Arabic Sense Tagging [15], the naïve Bayes classifier for AWSD [16], the Arabic WSD by using the variants of Lesk algorithm [17], the WSD-AL system [18,19], and so forth. Here, we define an unsupervised method named.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merhben et al [27] have proposed a hybrid approach for WSD in Arabic language. In this experiment, the authors use Latent Semantic Analysis, Harman, Croft and Okapi methods for information retrieval, and finally, the Lesk algorithm is developed for sense disambiguation.…”
Section: 2hmentioning
confidence: 99%