1976
DOI: 10.21236/adb014135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambiguity-Resistant Three- and Four-Channel Interferometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method provides the phase error for the three-element array. Another method to obtain the three-element array spacing was provided by Goodwin [25]. The array spacing is = /2.…”
Section: Methods For Obtaining Multiple Element Arrays Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This method provides the phase error for the three-element array. Another method to obtain the three-element array spacing was provided by Goodwin [25]. The array spacing is = /2.…”
Section: Methods For Obtaining Multiple Element Arrays Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Array configurations for a three-element interferometer with two different baselines are shown in Figure 1. The arrays may be classified according to the channel used for phase reference [25]. If the first channel is the reference for the other channel, the array is called endphase left, as shown in Figure 1(a).…”
Section: Array Configuration For Interferometer Df System Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When kd 2: 27r, a cannot be uniquely determined by the measured cpl because multiple values of a can give the same 01. It is possible to unambiguously determine a if multiple channel interferometers are suitably designed [3,4]. One can also uniquely determine a from Eq.…”
Section: Determination Of Target Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the typical required SNR for a phase interferometer in EW applications is 14-18 dB [1], the SNR was selected as 10, 13 and 16 dB. When the set of array spacing for the four-element array was d 1 = 3l, d 2 = 4l, and d 3 = 7.5l, the DF ambiguity probability at SNR = 13 dB was about 0.04% for [3], about 0.08% for simulations, and about 0.1% for the proposed method (Fig. 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%