Ambiguity in the Attribution of Social Impact: A Study of the Difficulties of Calculating Filter Coefficients in the SROI Method

Abstract

In order to analyse, manage, and compare social projects we need, among other things, to be able to measure their impact. One of the methodologies currently used to measure and manage social impact is Social Return on Investment (SROI). However, not all the results calculated by the SROI method are directly attributable to the project, and, therefore, to determine the real impact it is necessary to filter out the changes that the project has not produced. Filter coefficients perform this function. However, the theoretical logic on which the chain is constructed that converts the outputs into impacts is ambiguous. In this study, we will analyse twenty-five real cases where SROI was used to measure social projects. We will identify the difficulties of isolating and measuring impacts by performing a comparative study of the procedures that entities develop to calculate the filters. This allows us to calculate the impacts from the outputs. We will then propose the improvements needed to overcome these shortcomings.

Assessing the Social and Environmental Impact of Healthcare Technologies: Towards an Extended Social Return on Investment

“…The drop-off, finally, is related to the duration of the equipment. A diffused method of considering the drop-off is to deduct a fixed percentage for each year of the project duration [ 41 ]. In this study, a 20% coefficient was employed, due to the fact that the useful life of AGREE was evaluated, as previously reported, at 5 years.…”

Capturing the Invisible Wealth in Nonprofits to Overcome Myopic Perceptions

“…There are several articles that present extensive literature reviews on this topic including peer-reviewed articles and gray literature ranging between 2005 and 2016, but none collect any work specifically related to drug dependence or focused on addiction treatment [43,71]. While this is a recognized limitation, attempts were made to detect any academic work on these issues so far, but without success.…”

Challenges to measuring social value creation through social impact assessments: the case of RVA Works

“…Ventures calculating their SROI used their discretion to establish financial proxies, or “dollar value” estimated to all of their non-financial component parts, including volunteer work, as well as collective social impact, by evaluating the tangible and intangible positive benefits and negative costs avoided through their intervention. Ventures were expected to also account for several additional factors: deadweight costs or impact that would have occurred without the organization's actions; drop-off or reduction in program effect over time; and displacement or what percentage of the social impact achieved displaced other forms of social impact from other sources (Solórzano-García et al. , 2019).…”