2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambiguity and the corporation: Group disagreement and underinvestment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the same reason, the value of debt decreases, but to a smaller extent. Thus, consistent with Garlappi et al (2017), investments that entail increased ambiguity may suffer from an under-investment problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For the same reason, the value of debt decreases, but to a smaller extent. Thus, consistent with Garlappi et al (2017), investments that entail increased ambiguity may suffer from an under-investment problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It is worth noting that there are a number of studies documenting the dark side of diversity, namely, the presence of dissimilar directors on a board can increase coordination costs and decrease board members' ability to work together as a group on recommendations related to investment projects, acquisitions, and other key decisions (e.g.,Goodstein, Gautam, and Boeker (1994),Knyazeva, Knyazeva, and Raheja (2013),Adams, Akyol, and Verwijmeren (2018),Garlappi, Giammarino, and Lazrak (2017),Donaldson, Malenko, and Piacentino (2018), and Giannetti and Zhao (2019)). While diversity may become excessive and cause communication and coordination problems, this concern is unlikely to be severe for board gender diversity when there is only a small minority of women (on average, less than 9% of directors are women).3 Note that removing the country-year means from all firm-level observations in x i, j,t is equivalent to including country and year fixed effects in the within-country model of equation(1a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence of negative effects of combining groups with heterogeneous experiences. Garlappi et al (2017) show, through the use of a theoretical model, that board heterogeneity leads to underinvestment. Gender is a potential example of such heterogeneity.…”
Section: Experiential Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%