2004
DOI: 10.1080/1468384042000270344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambiguities of modernist nationalism: architectural culture and nation‐building in early Republican Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 The early decades of the Turkish Republic was a period during which the discourse of "Turkishness" was widely adopted for the homogenization of the multiethnic and multi-religious Ottoman past and for the construction of a collective national identity. 23 Sibel Bozdogan describes this as a paradigm shift since it reframed Ottoman architecture by establishing a Turkic genealogy distinguishing it from Byzantine as well as other kinds of Islamic architecture. 24 There were also attempts by the Ministry of Culture to reappropriate past civilizations as imprints of Turkish culture, portraying the Hittite, Roman, Byzantine, or Ottoman past as different periods of Turkish history.…”
Section: Commission For the Preservation Of Antiquities: Its Formatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The early decades of the Turkish Republic was a period during which the discourse of "Turkishness" was widely adopted for the homogenization of the multiethnic and multi-religious Ottoman past and for the construction of a collective national identity. 23 Sibel Bozdogan describes this as a paradigm shift since it reframed Ottoman architecture by establishing a Turkic genealogy distinguishing it from Byzantine as well as other kinds of Islamic architecture. 24 There were also attempts by the Ministry of Culture to reappropriate past civilizations as imprints of Turkish culture, portraying the Hittite, Roman, Byzantine, or Ottoman past as different periods of Turkish history.…”
Section: Commission For the Preservation Of Antiquities: Its Formatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The civilizing ambition of the nationalist republican leaders was to be implied primarily in the cities, where state power could be applied and displayed effectively, rather than the countryside. 29 Ankara, as the capital, became the fundamental stage of the country wherein the desired secular ideology and modernity would be actualized and exhibited. Furthermore, it was going to constitute a model for other Anatolian cities, 30 with its urban and spatial features as well as in its social and cultural structure.…”
Section: Formation Of Ankara and Its Imagementioning
confidence: 99%