2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor modelling in European and Central Asia urban areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
10
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…shows that these three components explain 97.4 % of the variability of the data. Almeida et al (2020) and Owoade et al (2015). The K, Cl and MGF corresponding to the Metallurgy source agree with that reported by Owoade et al (2015) in Nigeria.…”
Section: Determination Of Emission Sourcessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…shows that these three components explain 97.4 % of the variability of the data. Almeida et al (2020) and Owoade et al (2015). The K, Cl and MGF corresponding to the Metallurgy source agree with that reported by Owoade et al (2015) in Nigeria.…”
Section: Determination Of Emission Sourcessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Cu and MGF were associated with the Vehicular source and is in agreement with Banerjee et al (2015). Almeida et al (2020) andSDA (2009). THE source assigned as Vehicular (Cr, Mn, K, S) agrees…”
Section: Determination Of Emission Sourcessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PMF has been successfully applied in areas with many different characteristics in regions all around the world. Information about several components of PM such as the elements, ions, organic and elemental carbon are usually included in such studies (Almeida et al 2020;Banerjee et al 2015;Pateraki et al 2019). The most commonly identified sources include soil, secondary aerosols, vehicular emissions, fossil fuel burning, biomass burning, sea salt and industrial emissions (Pant and Harrison 2012;Sharma et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMF displays enhanced features with respect to the FA and PCA methods, namely the use of the experimental uncertainty in order to weigh the data values and non-negativity constraints for the obtained factors [33]. It is one of the most popular source apportionment techniques for atmospheric aerosol and is extensively used in the framework of air quality management [34][35][36]. PMF is a receptor modeling tool that attributes the observed elemental concentrations to their major emission sources without "a priori" information on source chemical profiles [36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%