Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies 2020
DOI: 10.5220/0008878800230032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambient Light Contribution as a Reference for Motion Artefacts Reduction in Photoplethysmography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since one of the effects of artifacts is the different number of detected heartbeats in the synchronized ECG and PPG signals, a direct comparison of both derived HRV and PRV signals is not trivial. Rather, to avoid this problem, different averaged metrics were used for the assumed time intervals, such as the heart rate (HR) or statistical measures, so that the number of samples in both signals was the same [34,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Direct comparisons between PRV and HRV extracted from the PPG and ECG have been studied only a few times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since one of the effects of artifacts is the different number of detected heartbeats in the synchronized ECG and PPG signals, a direct comparison of both derived HRV and PRV signals is not trivial. Rather, to avoid this problem, different averaged metrics were used for the assumed time intervals, such as the heart rate (HR) or statistical measures, so that the number of samples in both signals was the same [34,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Direct comparisons between PRV and HRV extracted from the PPG and ECG have been studied only a few times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since one of the effects of artifacts is the different number of detected heartbeats in the synchronized ECG and PPG signals, a direct comparison of both derived HRV and PRV signals is not trivial. Rather, to avoid this problem, different averaged metrics were used for the assumed time intervals, such as heart rate (HR) or statistical measures, so that the number of samples in both signals was the same [34,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Direct comparisons between PRV and HRV extracted from PPG and ECG have been studied only a few times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%