“…We talk about the complex human/non-human intersections with the aim of retracing two fundamental critical paths: on one hand, we subscribe to Stef Craps’ claims about a new wave of memory studies that goes ‘beyond anthropocentric modes of cognition and representation’ (Craps et al, 2018: 500), and we affirmatively reclaim the productivity of these claims in Amazonia, insofar as they resonate with Indigenous cosmovisions whereby non-human beings exist in a horizontal dialogue with humans. In her discussion of the dislocation of Amazonian urban paintings to non-Amazonian metropolises, Mitsuishi argues that, in Amazonian cosmovisions, ‘there is no duality between culture and nature, as all beings – including animals, plants, and spirits – are beings of culture’ (Mitsuishi, 2022: 5). Considering the Achuar people 1 in Peru, Descola (1988) illustrates this same concept in terms of intersubjectivity, which ‘turns every plant and animal into a subject that produces meaning’ (p. 50) 2 Indigenous scholarship, such as Alana Manchineri et al’s Portuguese-language volume Atualizar o mito (Manchineri and Manchineri, 2018), asks us exactly to bear in mind the absence of this duality when it comes to collective memory, stored and passed on, in Manchineri epistemology, through Tsrunnini ginkakle , that is, ‘histories of people from the past’ (Manchineri and Manchineri, 2018: 72), where non-human agents assume important, subjective roles in the accounts of the past.…”