2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amazonian ichthyoplankton assessment via DNA metabarcoding: A baseline for detecting spawning sites of migratory fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the increasing popularity of this method in the assessment of aquatic ecosystems using fish eDNA or ichthyoplankton pools (Carvalho, 2022;Cilleros et al, 2019;Sales et al, 2019;Sales et al, 2021, Silva et al, 2023, the vast majority of fish metabarcoding studies are still concentrated in temperate regions, in wellcharacterized and reasonably accessible environments (Lawson Handley et al, 2019;McDevitt et al, 2019). Considering the highly diverse Neotropical ichthyofauna, appropriate implementation of metabarcoding biomonitoring is hindered by a lack of knowledge of the local biodiversity (e.g., undescribed or cryptic species), primer biases, and the incompleteness of reference databases (Jackman et al, 2021;Sales, Mariani, et al, 2018;Sato et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the increasing popularity of this method in the assessment of aquatic ecosystems using fish eDNA or ichthyoplankton pools (Carvalho, 2022;Cilleros et al, 2019;Sales et al, 2019;Sales et al, 2021, Silva et al, 2023, the vast majority of fish metabarcoding studies are still concentrated in temperate regions, in wellcharacterized and reasonably accessible environments (Lawson Handley et al, 2019;McDevitt et al, 2019). Considering the highly diverse Neotropical ichthyofauna, appropriate implementation of metabarcoding biomonitoring is hindered by a lack of knowledge of the local biodiversity (e.g., undescribed or cryptic species), primer biases, and the incompleteness of reference databases (Jackman et al, 2021;Sales, Mariani, et al, 2018;Sato et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%