2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.crte.2005.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amazon River discharge estimated from TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry

Abstract: This paper presents an application of the TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) satellite altimetry data to estimate river discharge at three sites along the Amazon River. We discuss the methodology to establish empirical relationships between satellite-derived water levels and daily estimations of river discharges based on rating curves and in situ level measurements at gauging stations. Three sites are chosen: Manacapuru (River Solimões), Jatuarana (nearby the confluence of the Solimões and Rio Negro rivers) and Óbidos (Amaz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the size of the footprint, the radar altimetry technology has been widely applied to large rivers, such as the Amazon River [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], on which many altimeter sensors onboard of Geodetic Satellite (GeoSat) [13], TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) [14,15,18], ERS-2 and ENVISAT [19] have been tested. Few studies dedicated to a thorough assessment of the radar altimetry over rivers, such as Ob, Mekong, Negro, Gange and Brahmaputra, even without comparisons with in situ gauges, have been published [7,[20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the size of the footprint, the radar altimetry technology has been widely applied to large rivers, such as the Amazon River [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], on which many altimeter sensors onboard of Geodetic Satellite (GeoSat) [13], TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) [14,15,18], ERS-2 and ENVISAT [19] have been tested. Few studies dedicated to a thorough assessment of the radar altimetry over rivers, such as Ob, Mekong, Negro, Gange and Brahmaputra, even without comparisons with in situ gauges, have been published [7,[20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a relationship between the water level observations derived by radar altimetry and the ones measured in situ is identified, the in situ rating curve may be applied to the altimetry-derived water levels, provided that no lateral flow is present between the gauged site and VS and that the river cross-section geometry is quite similar. Otherwise, a specific rating curve at the VS can be directly developed, relating altimetry water levels to observed discharge at the gauged station (e.g., [18,20]). For discharge (or flow velocity) estimation where no in situ data are available at the VS, Bjerklie et al [27] proposed different equations involving various combinations of potentially remotely observable variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zakharova et al (2006) used JERS-1-SAR images and defined a virtual station by a rectangular window. However, several rectangular windows can be defined when islands are present.…”
Section: Literature Review Of "Virtual Station" Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These relations are commonly represented by rating curves and allow one to predict water discharges from observed water levels, with accuracy varying as a function of input data and flow regime characteristics. As examples, river discharges have been estimated from altimetric data in the Chari River (Coe and Birkett, 2004), Ob' River (Kouraev et al, 2004), Amazon River (Zakharova et al, 2006) and Zambezi River (Michailovsky et al, 2012). Although errors between predicted and observed water discharges are relatively small in most applications, the use of such methods is restricted to VS located near gauging stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%