2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amalgamation of the North China Craton: Key issues and discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
246
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 841 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
5
246
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1a) is the oldest cratonic block in China (∼3.8 Ga; Liu et al, 1992), with widespread Archean to Paleoproterozoic rocks (Fig. 1a) forming during several tectonic cycles (e.g., Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Lu et al, 2008;Zhai et al, 2010;Zhao and Zhai, 2013). It is commonly recognized that the NCC resulted from amalgamation of several microblocks, but the timing and processes involved are still a subject of debate (e.g., Kusky and Li, 2003;Zhai et al, 2000Zhai et al, , 2005Zhai et al, , 2010Zhao, 2001;Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Zhao and Zhai, 2013), with several competing models proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1a) is the oldest cratonic block in China (∼3.8 Ga; Liu et al, 1992), with widespread Archean to Paleoproterozoic rocks (Fig. 1a) forming during several tectonic cycles (e.g., Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Lu et al, 2008;Zhai et al, 2010;Zhao and Zhai, 2013). It is commonly recognized that the NCC resulted from amalgamation of several microblocks, but the timing and processes involved are still a subject of debate (e.g., Kusky and Li, 2003;Zhai et al, 2000Zhai et al, , 2005Zhai et al, , 2010Zhao, 2001;Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Zhao and Zhai, 2013), with several competing models proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a) forming during several tectonic cycles (e.g., Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Lu et al, 2008;Zhai et al, 2010;Zhao and Zhai, 2013). It is commonly recognized that the NCC resulted from amalgamation of several microblocks, but the timing and processes involved are still a subject of debate (e.g., Kusky and Li, 2003;Zhai et al, 2000Zhai et al, , 2005Zhai et al, , 2010Zhao, 2001;Zhao et al, 2005Zhao et al, , 2012Zhao and Zhai, 2013), with several competing models proposed. Zhai et al (2000Zhai et al ( , 2005Zhai et al ( , 2010 proposed that the NCC can be divided into several microblocks connected by greenstone belts and granites and were amalgamated at the end of the Neoarchean (∼2.5 Ga).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), and among them, the granulites could be classified into two types, the high-pressure granulites and (ultra-) high-temperature granulites (e.g., Zhai et al 2005;Zhai and Santosh, 2011;Zhao et al 2005Zhao et al , 2012Lu et al 2008;Zhao and Zhai, 2013;Peng et al 2014;Fig. 2).…”
Section: Distribution Of the Paleoproterozoic Granulites In The Northmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the imprint of a major 2.5 Ga tectono-thermal event was particularly strong in the NCC Wan et al, 2012c, and references therein). Although multiple tectono-thermal events have been revealed by the diverse chemistry of supracrustal and intrusive rock associations, zircon dating and Hf and Nd isotope studies (Zhao et al, 2012 and references therein), most magmatic events older than 2.8 Ga are reported only from the Eastern Block of the NCC (Liu et al, 1992;Song et al, 1996;Wan et al, 2012a and references therein).…”
Section: Continental Crustal Growth and Crustal Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%