2021
DOI: 10.1001/978-1-64016-208-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMA Guides® to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 6th Edition, 2021

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patient's loss of digits 2-5 created a 60% impairment of the hand, which produced concomitant disability and psychological distress. 6 Reconstructive methods were explored at each stage of this patient's clinical course, and rehabilitation with prosthesis utilization was ultimately chosen as it could restore finger length, improve hand function, and mitigate his social anxiety. [7][8][9] Relying on the UE prosthetist's expertise, the MCPDriver was selected as a good patient-fit because it could harness the patient's intact MPJ, restore synchronous hand motion, and would provide protection to the residual phalanges through its roll-cage design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient's loss of digits 2-5 created a 60% impairment of the hand, which produced concomitant disability and psychological distress. 6 Reconstructive methods were explored at each stage of this patient's clinical course, and rehabilitation with prosthesis utilization was ultimately chosen as it could restore finger length, improve hand function, and mitigate his social anxiety. [7][8][9] Relying on the UE prosthetist's expertise, the MCPDriver was selected as a good patient-fit because it could harness the patient's intact MPJ, restore synchronous hand motion, and would provide protection to the residual phalanges through its roll-cage design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%