AMA Code of Medical Ethics'  Opinions About End-of-Life Care and Death

Chaet, Danielle Hahn

doi:10.1001/amajethics.2020.1025

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

(3 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ideally, when patients lack decisional capacity and advance directives, the care team is able to identify a default surrogate who knows the patient’s values, beliefs and preferences, and can offer a substituted judgment of what the patient would want [ 29 , 30 ]. However, with more adults living in social isolation [ 31 ], the healthcare system may face a growing number of patients who will have no voice in determining which life-prolonging or life-limiting care they will receive.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using natural language processing to identify acute care patients who lack advance directives, decisional capacity, and surrogate decision makers

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prevalence of patients who are Incapacitated with No Evident Advance Directives or Surrogates (INEADS) remains unknown because such data are not routinely captured in structured electronic health records. This study sought to develop and validate a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to identify information related to being INEADS from clinical notes. We used a publicly available dataset of critical care patients from 2001 through 2012 at a United States academic medical center, which contained 418,393 relevant clinical notes for 23,904 adult admissions. We developed 17 subcategories indicating reduced or elevated potential for being INEADS, and created a vocabulary of terms and expressions within each. We used an NLP application to create a language model and expand these vocabularies. The NLP algorithm was validated against gold standard manual review of 300 notes and showed good performance overall (F-score = 0.83). More than 80% of admissions had notes containing information in at least one subcategory. Thirty percent (n = 7,134) contained at least one of five social subcategories indicating elevated potential for being INEADS, and <1% (n = 81) contained at least four, which we classified as high likelihood of being INEADS. Among these, n = 8 admissions had no subcategory indicating reduced likelihood of being INEADS, and appeared to meet the definition of INEADS following manual review. Among the remaining n = 73 who had at least one subcategory indicating reduced likelihood of being INEADS, manual review of a 10% sample showed that most did not appear to be INEADS. Compared with the full cohort, the high likelihood group was significantly more likely to die during hospitalization and within four years, to have Medicaid, to have an emergency admission, and to be male. This investigation demonstrates potential for NLP to identify INEADS patients, and may inform interventions to enhance advance care planning for patients who lack social support.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%