2013
DOI: 10.1177/0269881113477710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AM404 attenuates reinstatement of nicotine seeking induced by nicotine-associated cues and nicotine priming but does not affect nicotine- and food-taking

Abstract: Multiple studies suggest a pivotal role of the endocannabinoid system in the regulation of the reinforcing effects of various substances of abuse. Different approaches have been used to modulate endocannabinoid neurotransmission including the use of endogenous cannabinoid anandamide reuptake inhibitors. Previously, the effects of one of them, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-arachidonamide (AM404), have been explored in rodents trained to self-administer ethanol and heroin, producing some promising results. Moreover, AM404… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with previous studies showing that treatment with URB597 does not affect responding for food (Adamcyk et al, 2009; Kangas et al, 2016; Oleson et al, 2012), nicotine (Forget et al, 2009; Scherma et al, 2008), heroin (Solinas et al, 2005), anandamide, THC and cocaine (Adamcyk et al, 2009; Justinova et al, 2008) in rats and non-human primates. Similarly, inhibiting the reuptake of anandamide with AM404 had no effect on responding for food in rats (Gamaleddin et al, 2013). Together, these data show that increasing anandamide tone through inhibition of its degradation or reuptake does not profoundly alter the incentive motivational properties of rewards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are in line with previous studies showing that treatment with URB597 does not affect responding for food (Adamcyk et al, 2009; Kangas et al, 2016; Oleson et al, 2012), nicotine (Forget et al, 2009; Scherma et al, 2008), heroin (Solinas et al, 2005), anandamide, THC and cocaine (Adamcyk et al, 2009; Justinova et al, 2008) in rats and non-human primates. Similarly, inhibiting the reuptake of anandamide with AM404 had no effect on responding for food in rats (Gamaleddin et al, 2013). Together, these data show that increasing anandamide tone through inhibition of its degradation or reuptake does not profoundly alter the incentive motivational properties of rewards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associations between behavioral responses to nicotine and the eCB system have previously been shown with respect to reward, conditioning and drug reinstatement (Castane et al 2002;Cohen et al 2002;Merritt et al 2008;Gamaleddin et al 2013). Inhibition of eCB signaling attenuates nicotine-induced activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system, reduces self-administration and inhibits acquisition and expression of nicotineinduced place preference (Castane et al 2002;Cohen et al 2002;Cheer et al 2007;Hadjiconstantinou & Neff 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Inhibition of eCB signaling attenuates nicotine-induced activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system, reduces self-administration and inhibits acquisition and expression of nicotineinduced place preference (Castane et al 2002;Cohen et al 2002;Cheer et al 2007;Hadjiconstantinou & Neff 2011). On the opposite, activation of CB1Rs or inhibition of eCB metabolism enhances nicotine self-administration and expression of nicotine-induced place preference (Merritt et al 2008;Gamaleddin et al 2013). Interestingly, eCB levels are altered by acute and repeated nicotine exposure (Gonzalez et al 2002;Buczynski, Polis, & Parsons 2013), and the endogenous ligand for the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), acetylcholine, appears to regulate eCB-mediated plasticity in the striatum (eCB-LTD) (Partridge et al 2002;Adermark 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that anandamide might counteract the addictive effect of nicotine. However, inhibition of anandamide uptake failed to reduce nicotine taking behavior in rats trained to self-administer nicotine under fixed-ratio or progressive-ratio schedules [137,138].…”
Section: Anandamide Uptake Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In reinstatement models of relapse in rats, anandamide uptake inhibitors dosedependently reduced nicotine seeking induced by nicotine-conditioned stimuli or by nicotine priming, [137,138] (see Table 13.3). Moreover, AM404 prevented the development of nicotine-induced CPP and impeded nicotine-induced reinstatement of extinguished CPP [74].…”
Section: Anandamide Uptake Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%