2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Am I typing fresh tweets: Detecting up-to-dateness and worth of categorical information in microblogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, a data set composed of 100 users, of which 36 were humans, 36 cyborgs, and 28 bots, was mounted. Although the amount of users might look small in comparison to the milions of active Twitter accounts, some of the literature has used about the same number of users for classification goals, as seen in [12]. In this paper, this was also possible due to the fact that the range of variation of written texts about a single subject is not that big.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a data set composed of 100 users, of which 36 were humans, 36 cyborgs, and 28 bots, was mounted. Although the amount of users might look small in comparison to the milions of active Twitter accounts, some of the literature has used about the same number of users for classification goals, as seen in [12]. In this paper, this was also possible due to the fact that the range of variation of written texts about a single subject is not that big.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%