Abstract:Recent scholarship has identified how the reading assessment process can be improved by adapting to and accounting for emergent bilinguals’ multilingual resources. While this work provides guidance about how teachers can take this approach within their assessment practices, this article strengthens and builds on this scholarship by combining translanguaging and raciolinguistic lenses to examine the ideologies that circulate through assessment. By comparing interview data from English as a new language and dual… Show more
“…Maggie asked, “[as] you think about this definition, what are some implications in terms of your lives or your practice?” Nadia responded, “It made me automatically think of [report cards]…grading someone on speaking and listening is just literally putting a value on their bodies, and mind, and what we expect of them.” Here, Nadia applied Lewis’ (2020) definition of ableism to taken‐for‐granted literacy and language practices, pinpointing textual junctures. She identified how report cards systematically place value on children’s communicative abilities, assessing and ranking them in relation to societally‐constructed schooled expectations for early literacy, which are fundamentally rooted in white, English‐dominant practices (Ascenzi‐Moreno and Seltzer, 2021).…”
In this participatory case study, we explored the critical literacy practices of early‐career early childhood teachers in a year‐long inquiry group, examining how they collectively read school as text through DisCrit literacies. Bridging literature from Disability Critical Race Theory (DisCrit) and critical literacies scholarship, DisCrit literacies involve practices of critically reading school itself as text and uncovering intersecting systems of ableism and racism. We describe teachers’ collective engagement in DisCrit literacies, in which they: (a) deconstructed literacy practices and broader schooling mechanisms through repeated shared readings; (b) implicated themselves through critical readings of literacy classroom artifacts; and (c) identified and designed spaces of subversion and refusal in their literacy classrooms. Across each of these practices, early career early childhood teachers in our study used critical reading practices rooted in interdependence and presumptions of competence to redesign literacy routines. Ultimately, DisCrit literacies supported teachers in dismantling systems of regulation and classification in their early literacy classrooms, and—in solidarity with multiply‐marginalized children— imagining otherwise possibilities. We conclude with implications for teacher education and research, exploring how we might use DisCrit literacies to move toward humanizing early literacy spaces with and for multiply‐marginalized young children.
“…Maggie asked, “[as] you think about this definition, what are some implications in terms of your lives or your practice?” Nadia responded, “It made me automatically think of [report cards]…grading someone on speaking and listening is just literally putting a value on their bodies, and mind, and what we expect of them.” Here, Nadia applied Lewis’ (2020) definition of ableism to taken‐for‐granted literacy and language practices, pinpointing textual junctures. She identified how report cards systematically place value on children’s communicative abilities, assessing and ranking them in relation to societally‐constructed schooled expectations for early literacy, which are fundamentally rooted in white, English‐dominant practices (Ascenzi‐Moreno and Seltzer, 2021).…”
In this participatory case study, we explored the critical literacy practices of early‐career early childhood teachers in a year‐long inquiry group, examining how they collectively read school as text through DisCrit literacies. Bridging literature from Disability Critical Race Theory (DisCrit) and critical literacies scholarship, DisCrit literacies involve practices of critically reading school itself as text and uncovering intersecting systems of ableism and racism. We describe teachers’ collective engagement in DisCrit literacies, in which they: (a) deconstructed literacy practices and broader schooling mechanisms through repeated shared readings; (b) implicated themselves through critical readings of literacy classroom artifacts; and (c) identified and designed spaces of subversion and refusal in their literacy classrooms. Across each of these practices, early career early childhood teachers in our study used critical reading practices rooted in interdependence and presumptions of competence to redesign literacy routines. Ultimately, DisCrit literacies supported teachers in dismantling systems of regulation and classification in their early literacy classrooms, and—in solidarity with multiply‐marginalized children— imagining otherwise possibilities. We conclude with implications for teacher education and research, exploring how we might use DisCrit literacies to move toward humanizing early literacy spaces with and for multiply‐marginalized young children.
“…The opportunity for Jain to build from his funds of knowledge and invest himself discursively in his FYW task also serves as an example of why courses with small class sizes like FYW have been identified as potential sites of validation for Latinx/a/o and other minoritized students (Baca et al, 2019;Hungerford-Kresser and Vetter, 2012). Beyond FYW, attention to teacher assessment epistemologies across institutional and disciplinary contexts must continue to be examined with a focus on the relationships of literacies, identities, and power in teaching and learning (Ascenzi-Moreno & Seltzer, 2021;Newell et al, 2014).…”
Developing academic writers must continually position themselves discursively as they negotiate institutional, programmatic, and disciplinary contexts. The inextricable relationship of writing and identities raises questions of access to social identities in schools, a particularly salient issue when considering the complexities and challenges of the high school to college transition for students from historically marginalized groups. This study focuses on Jain, a first-generation Latino college student, as he positions himself as a writer over 18 months in response to a range of school-based writing tasks. My analysis finds that Jain’s identity negotiations are influenced by a history of social positioning in schools, as his stance-making patterns and sense of self as a writer reflect resources and opportunities he encounters. This study adds to research demonstrating the role teachers and institutions can play in (in)validating certain aspects of students’ identities and influencing belonging in school spaces, indicating a need for educators and researchers across K-12 and college contexts to continue to challenge the standardization of school writing and the prevalence of assessments that limit curricula and constrain identities.
“…For example, 10.2% of children in public schools are English-language learners (ELLs) as of 2018 (National Center for Education Statistics, 2021). A third of these students are in Grades 6–12, struggling with academic instruction that is not adapted to their unique circumstances (Ascenzi-Moreno & Seltzer, 2021). Studies suggest that bilingual professionals are needed for measurement design and reading assessment refinement to better capture emergent bilingual students’ reading abilities (Ascenzi-Moreno & Seltzer, 2021).…”
Section: Opportunities For Psychologists To Practice the Apa’s Four P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third of these students are in Grades 6–12, struggling with academic instruction that is not adapted to their unique circumstances (Ascenzi-Moreno & Seltzer, 2021). Studies suggest that bilingual professionals are needed for measurement design and reading assessment refinement to better capture emergent bilingual students’ reading abilities (Ascenzi-Moreno & Seltzer, 2021). Bilingual psychologists have had a positive impact on performing assessments among ELLs students (O’Bryon & Rogers, 2010).…”
Section: Opportunities For Psychologists To Practice the Apa’s Four P...mentioning
What can psychologists do to address social determinants of health and promote health equity among America's approximately 20 million children in immigrant families (CIF)? This article identifies gaps in current research and argues for a stronger role for psychologists. Psychologists can advocate for and enact changes in institutional systems that contribute to inequities in social determinants of health and promote resources and services necessary for CIF to flourish. We consider systemic exclusionary and discriminatory barriers faced by CIF, including a heightened anti-immigrant political climate, continued threat of immigration enforcement, restricted access to the social safety net, and the disproportionate health, economic, and educational burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. We highlight the potential role of psychologists in (a) leading prevention that addresses stressors such as poverty and trauma; (b) changing systems to mitigate risk factors for CIF; (c) expanding workforce development across multiple disciplines to better serve their needs; (d) identifying mechanisms, such as racial profiling, that contribute to health inequity, and viewing them as public health harms; and (e) guiding advocacy for resources at local, state, and federal levels, including by linking discriminatory policies or practices with health inequity. A key recommendation to increase psychologists' impact is for academic and professional institutions to strengthen relationships with policymakers to effectively convey these findings in spaces where decisions about policies and practices are made. We conclude that psychologists are well positioned to promote systemic change across multiple societal levels and disciplines to improve the well-being of CIF and offer them a better future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.