Alveolar osteitis treatment using Holisal gel

Зорина, О А; Петрухина, Н Б; Борискина, О А

doi:10.17116/stomat20199806158

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Необхідність емпіричного призначення антибіотиків при госпіталізації та перебування пацієнтів у відділеннях хірургічного профілю, реанімації та інтенсивної терапії обумовлює високий ризик колонізації му-льтирезистентними штамами мікроорганізмів [7]. Дані українських багатоцентрових досліджень свідчать про високий рівень стійкості збудників хірургічних інфекцій до антимікробних препаратів [4,8,9].…”

Section: метаunclassified

“…Для місцевого лікування альвеоліту застосовують цілий ряд лікарських засобів, які спрямовані на усунення запальних проявів та больового синдрому. На амбулаторному прийомі для лікування і профілактики альвеоліту найчастіше використовують такі антисептичні препарати як йодоформ і хлоргексидин [8,9,10,11,12].…”

unclassified

“…Йодоформ -антисептичний засіб, який широко використовується місцево в хірургічній стоматології і в ендодонтії [4,9]. Впливу йодоформу у складі комплексних стоматологічних матеріалів і препаратів на мікроорганізми присвятила увагу значна кількість дослідників [13,14].…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Antimicrobial Effect of Iodoform and Chlorhexidine on Museum Strains of Microorganisms

Chumak

Ananieva

Faustova

et al. 2021

Act. Probl. of the Modern Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surgical tooth extraction can result in a number of complications. Alveolitis is an infectious and inflammatory process in the walls of a tooth socket that may occur after tooth extraction during at the oral surgery outpatient appointment. This condition is characterized by a partial or complete absence of a blood clot, called as "dry socket", and pain syndrome. There are various factors, which can contribute to the development of this process, but the most common are traumatic and infectious ones. For the local treatment of alveolitis, a number of drugs are used to eliminate inflammatory manifestations and pain syndrome. During an outpatient appointment for the treatment of alveolitis, antiseptic drugs as iodoform and chlorhexidine are most often used. Iodoform is an antiseptic widely used locally in oral surgery and in endodontics. Chlorhexidine is also widely used in dentistry as an antiseptic. The aim of this in vitro study is to investigate the antimicrobial properties of iodoform and chlorhexidine using museum strains of microorganisms. Materials and methods. Museum strains of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Esherichia coli ATCC 25922, Candida albicans ATCC 10231 were used the studied cultures of microorganisms. The antimicrobial effect of iodoform and chlorhexidine was determined by a quantitative method of serial dilutions in broth and agar. For this purpose, we used iodoform suspension, which corresponded to 200.0 mg / ml of the working concentration of the agent. A 0.05% solution of chlorhexidine bigluconate was used that corresponded to 500 μg / ml of the working concentration of the agent. Results and discussion. Iodoform as powder in the studied concentrations caused an insignificant static effect on museum strains of E. faecalis, E. coli, but did not exhibit a bactericidal effect against them. In relation to the C. albicans strain, iodoform demonstrated fungiostatic properties. The S. epidermidis and S. aureus strains were resistant to iodoform. Chlorhexidine caused both inhibitory and microbicidal action on all studied strains of microorganisms.

show abstract

Section: метаunclassified

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Antimicrobial Effect of Iodoform and Chlorhexidine on Museum Strains of Microorganisms

Chumak

Ananieva

Faustova

et al. 2021

Act. Probl. of the Modern Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The conventional treatment for AO involves sterile saline irrigation of the socket until all visible debris has been eliminated, followed by the placement of an obtundent dressing into the socket [ 1 ]. Some studies reported the use of different irrigants to rinse the alveolar socket such as clindamycin, rifampicin [ 4 ], or fill it with medicaments that include alvogyl, zinc-oxide eugenol (ZOE) [ 5 , 6 ], honey [ 7 ], turmeric [ 8 ], and Holisal gel [ 9 ]. Nevertheless, these methods can only alleviate the symptoms but do not enhance the healing of the socket [ 10 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study

Sun

Zhao

2022

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Alveolar osteitis (AO) is one of the most commonly encountered complication following tooth extraction, however, to date there is no standard methods of prevention and treatment. The study aims to investigate the efficiency of minocycline hydrochloride ointment (MHO) for the treatment of alveolar osteitis compared with traditional treatment with iodoform gauze (IG). Methods/design STROBE checklist was followed to report this study. All patients underwent tooth extraction either in our department or other hospitals, whom presented with postoperative pain, were screened out to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study about AO. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our prospective cohort study, and MHO or IG was administered. The Visual analog scale scores were used to assess the pain score of patients. The healing status of the extraction sockets was followed up. Differences in responses between groups were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Chi-square test was performed to explore the differences in the teeth position of AO. Results Of 41,371 patients underwent tooth extraction with post-operative follow-up in our departments, only 20 patients (0.05%) suffered from AO. 31 patients with AO, whose teeth were extracted in other places, were also enrolled. The incidence of AO was significantly higher in third molars than other teeth (P < 0.01). In 28 patients that were treated with MHO, the pain was relieved substantially on day 3 and almost painless on day 7. And only 25% of cases required dressing change more than once. Whilst 23 patients treated with IG, the pain was relieved on day 5, and 56.5% of cases required multiple dressing change. The difference between the two groups of VAS scores had statistical significance during treatment at 8 h, 24 h, 3d, 5d, and 7d. No allergic reaction or further infection occurred. Conclusion MHO has a safer and higher therapeutic effect in the treatment of AO compared with traditional treatment with IG. MHO may become a preferred treatment modality for AO.

show abstract

“…There are various other additional agents commonly applied to dry socket that include hydrogen peroxide, alvogyl, zinc oxide eugenol, honey [5], turmeric [6], and clindamycin [7], and combined use of colloidal silver, Traumeel S, Polymic [4], and Holisal gel [8]. These conventional methods address the symptoms only but do not enhance the healing of the socket.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of dry socket with low-level laser therapy

Kamal

Salman

et al. 2020

Clin Oral Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of delivering low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the management of dry socket at University Dental Hospital Sharjah. Materials and method Forty-five patients with dry socket were divided into two treatment groups. Group I dry socket patients (n = 30) received conventional treatment while group II patients (n = 15) were irradiated with LLLT at a setting of 200-mW, 6-J, continuous-wave mode using an R02 tipless handpiece (Fotona Er:YAG, Europe), on the buccal, lingual, and middle surfaces of the socket for 30 s from a delivery distance of 1 cm. Pain score and quantification of granulation tissue in the socket were recorded at 0, 4, and 7 days post-dry socket treatment. Results Results showed that the LLLT-irradiated group II sockets showed a much lower VAS pain score of 1-2 as early as day 4, and a richer amount of granulation tissue compared to the conventional treated group I socket. The amount and rate of granulation tissue formation in the dry socket are inversely proportional to the pain score showing significant clinical effectiveness of LLLT on promoting the healing of the dry socket, with improvement in symptoms (P = .001). Conventionally treated dry sockets take at least 7 days to match the effective healing of an LLLT-irradiated dry socket. Conclusion LLLT irradiation influences biomodulation of dry socket healing by dampening inflammation, promoting vascularization, stimulating granulation, and controlling pain symptoms. Clinical relevance LLLT may be an additional effective tool for managing dry sockets in general dental practice.

show abstract

Alveolar osteitis treatment using Holisal gel

Cited by 5 publications

References 10 publications

Antimicrobial Effect of Iodoform and Chlorhexidine on Museum Strains of Microorganisms

Antimicrobial Effect of Iodoform and Chlorhexidine on Museum Strains of Microorganisms

The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study

Management of dry socket with low-level laser therapy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About