Alveolar bone repair following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars

Marmary, Yitzhak; Brayer, L.; Tzukert, A.; Feller, Liviu

doi:10.1016/0030-4220(86)90409-3

Cited by 52 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1,6,7,9,11,28 Time is a variable that directly affects the results of the radiographic variables studied, as noted in other articles. 6,7,9,11,28 Many studies have compared bone changes in only 2 situations, usually before and after surgery, and with retrospective evaluations up to 12 months or with averages of a few years. 3,4,7,9,10,12 Only Ash et al 1 and Kugelberg et al 28 performed a prospective evaluation at 12 months.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Radiological Infrabony Defects After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extractions in Young Adults

Faria

Torreira

López-Ratón

et al. 2013

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Most of these studies have concluded that in 90% of cases, the presence of an impacted mesially inclined or horizontal M3 decreases the amount of bone in the distal aspect of the M2, and its extraction is associated with the presence of bone defects and infrabony periodontal pockets with loss of clinical attachment.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiological Infrabony Defects After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extractions in Young Adults

Faria

Torreira

López-Ratón

et al. 2013

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The radiographic techniques utilized were also different in those studies. Furthermore, they did not use the same methods of measurement and calibration, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] nor did the majority of them evaluate the error of their radiographic technique. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Krausz et al 27 twice performed linear computerized measures of bone defects in panoramic radiographs, with minutes between them initially and 12 months later; the error between these evaluated measures was about 5% (r 2 5 95%).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Repeatability and accuracy of a paralleling technique for radiographic evaluation of distal bone healing after impacted third molar surgery

Faria

Torreira²,

López-Ratón

2013

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the repeatability and radiographic accuracy of an intraoral paralleling technique to evaluate periodontal bone healing on the distal surface of the second mandibular molar (2 Mm) after impacted third mandibular molar (3 Mm) surgical extraction. Methods: In order to estimate the variation in different radiographs, three replicas were made, each from 2 Mm, totalling 69 radiographic radicular longitude (RRL) recordings. One operator performed the periapical radiographs in a standard manner, utilizing a modified posterior film holder for the radiographic technique of parallelism, applied on the posterior region with the X-ray beam focused on the centre of 2 Mm. These radiographic recordings of the same region were obtained on three different and separate occasions, over a 12 month evaluation period after surgical extraction of the impacted 3 Mm. The RRL variable was measured and recorded three times by the same operator, with side-by-side comparison of three posterior periapical radiographs, irrespective of when the assessments were performed. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the three replica recordings (p 5 0.969). The correlations between the three sets of measurements were evaluated and found to be highly associated (intraclass correlation reliability coefficient 5 0.90) and statistically significant (p#0.05). The median and mean error of the radiographic technique evaluated was ¡0.257 mm and ¡0.347 mm, respectively. Conclusions: The radiographic technique described permits standardization in periapical radiographs with a high repeatability and accuracy in posterior radiographic records (distal surface of 2

show abstract

“…Favorable alveolar bone repair following extraction of the impacted third molar could also have contributed to preserving the pulpal environment. Marmary et al 9) found that the degree of bone healing is affected primarily by age, and was higher in patients under the age of 30, and that periodontitis, pericoronitis, and dry socket developed among the "failureto-heal" cases after the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. In summary, it is likely that our patient's young age lead to desirable alveolar bone healing, which in turn protected against inflammation, thus keeping the pulp of the remaining tooth vital.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pressure Root Resorption of the Second Molar Caused by Third Molar Impaction: A Case Report of Severely Resorbed Root with Vital Pulp

Kang¹,

Kim²

2016

Journal of Korean Dental Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pressure root resorption can be observed during the eruption of permanent dentition, especially of the maxillary canines (affecting lateral incisors) and mandibular third molars (affecting mandibular second molars). Since the cause of root resorption of the adjacent affected teeth is evident, treatment simply involves extraction of the impacted tooth. However, there have been few reports on the prognosis of the remaining resorbed tooth, as dentists often choose to extract them when damage due to root resorption is observed. We report a case involving a tooth that was severely resorbed due to pressure from an adjacent impacted tooth. After extraction of the impacted tooth, the remaining tooth retained vital pulp and survived as a functional tooth.

show abstract

Alveolar bone repair following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars

Cited by 52 publications

References 5 publications

Radiological Infrabony Defects After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extractions in Young Adults

Radiological Infrabony Defects After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extractions in Young Adults

Repeatability and accuracy of a paralleling technique for radiographic evaluation of distal bone healing after impacted third molar surgery

Pressure Root Resorption of the Second Molar Caused by Third Molar Impaction: A Case Report of Severely Resorbed Root with Vital Pulp

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About