2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000256064.74938.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alveolar Bone Formation in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate after Early Secondary Gingivoalveoloplasty: Long-Term Results

Abstract: Early secondary gingivoalveoloplasty seems to allow for adequate ossification in both the alveolar and the nasal regions. Permanent tooth eruption occurs at a normal rate. None of the patients has required a secondary alveolar bone graft.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study on younger patients, we have noted that none of the patients who had reached the age for bone grafting needed any secondary bone grafting (Meazzini et al, 2007). In this study with patients at the age of implant substitution again no secondary or pre-implant bone grafting was needed.…”
Section: Ossificationmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous study on younger patients, we have noted that none of the patients who had reached the age for bone grafting needed any secondary bone grafting (Meazzini et al, 2007). In this study with patients at the age of implant substitution again no secondary or pre-implant bone grafting was needed.…”
Section: Ossificationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Type II: slightly asymmetrical notched. Type III: severely asymmetrical notched nasal floor (Meazzini et al, 2007).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ossificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alveolar ossification after early secondary gingivoalveoloplasty was studied in 87 patients with UCLP and it was shown that there was no need for subsequent secondary bone grafting in any patients in the sample [17]. Although quality of ossification is an important aspect, another important question that still needs to be answered is whether early secondary gingivoalveoloplasty has any negative influence on the growth and development of the maxillary arch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%