2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alveolar air leakage in COVID-19 patients: Pneumomediastinum and/or pneumopericardium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, after the second outbreak of the pandemic, since 1 October 2020 until the end of January 2021, of all 1648 patients admitted in the hospital, we observed the occurrence of these complications in 11 subjects, leading to a prevalence of 0.66%, similar to around 1% reported for hospitalized patients in the medical literature [ 3 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. As in the other studies, the male gender prevailed (72.72%), and the supposed pathophysiological mechanisms were air leakage through the alveolar walls, damage by inflammation, and damage by the subsequent cytokine storm [ 1 , 2 , 5 , 14 ]. In our patients, all these complications occurred spontaneously, after several days of evolution, often coinciding with the aggravation of pulmonary lesions, but in the absence of invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, after the second outbreak of the pandemic, since 1 October 2020 until the end of January 2021, of all 1648 patients admitted in the hospital, we observed the occurrence of these complications in 11 subjects, leading to a prevalence of 0.66%, similar to around 1% reported for hospitalized patients in the medical literature [ 3 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. As in the other studies, the male gender prevailed (72.72%), and the supposed pathophysiological mechanisms were air leakage through the alveolar walls, damage by inflammation, and damage by the subsequent cytokine storm [ 1 , 2 , 5 , 14 ]. In our patients, all these complications occurred spontaneously, after several days of evolution, often coinciding with the aggravation of pulmonary lesions, but in the absence of invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…COVID-19 has become the largest pandemic in recent centuries and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as a large spectrum of complications. Several articles, published in the medical literature worldwide [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ], debate sporadic cases of spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PM), pneumothorax (PT), pneumopericardium (PP), and subcutaneous emphysema (SE) diagnosed in patients with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia, even in the absence of mechanical ventilation associated with barotrauma. Subsequently, several retrospective studies [ 4 , 5 ], the largest one being a multicenter analysis of Martinelli et al [ 3 ], focused on this topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wali et al 17 managed patients aggressively by placing chest drains, whereas Volpi et al 18 successfully managed two patients of PM by conservative approach. Hamad et al 19 suggested inserting a unilateral intrapleural chest drain to protect at least one side against potential pneumothorax. All three patients in our series were managed conservatively – one patient recovered, and the other two patients died due to multi-organ failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that SARS-CoV-2 attaches to the respiratory epithelium and attacks the alveolar cells by entering through angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, this in combination with cytokine storm make the alveoli vulnerable to rupture, resulting in air leakage and the development of cystic air space lesions, and cause lung cystic abnormalities in up to 10% of the patients [ 13 , 14 ]. When SARS-CoV-2 infection starts, pleural effusion can occur with varying incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%