2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022012923562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[59] Under these conditions, a weak effect of the nature of guest molecule on compressibility (bulk modulus) of the gas hydrate appears to be reasonable. On the other hand, in the case of the high-pressure hydrate of SF 6 (CS-I) [60,61] and the hydrate of CCl 4 (CS-II) existing at atmospheric pressure, [62] guest molecules are in close contact with the atoms of the framework or with the guest molecules occupying neighboring cavities. In these cases, one may expect substantially smaller hydrate compressibilities in comparison with the values given above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[59] Under these conditions, a weak effect of the nature of guest molecule on compressibility (bulk modulus) of the gas hydrate appears to be reasonable. On the other hand, in the case of the high-pressure hydrate of SF 6 (CS-I) [60,61] and the hydrate of CCl 4 (CS-II) existing at atmospheric pressure, [62] guest molecules are in close contact with the atoms of the framework or with the guest molecules occupying neighboring cavities. In these cases, one may expect substantially smaller hydrate compressibilities in comparison with the values given above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%