The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-2219(99)00232-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alumina disks with different surface finish: thermal shock behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,13,14 The specimen mounted horizontally on a refractory material with the indented upper surface, was heated in an electric furnace up to a predetermined temperature (T i ) and allowed to equilibrate for 90 min. Then, it was subjected to a sudden cooling using a high velocity air jet at room temperature (T 0 = 26-27 • C) channelled by a silica tube (inner diameter: 3.58 ± 0.02 mm, 90 • and 3 mm above the surface) for 20 s. After quenching, the specimen was cooled up to room temperature and examined for crack extension from the original indentation crack.…”
Section: Mechanical and Thermal Shock Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,13,14 The specimen mounted horizontally on a refractory material with the indented upper surface, was heated in an electric furnace up to a predetermined temperature (T i ) and allowed to equilibrate for 90 min. Then, it was subjected to a sudden cooling using a high velocity air jet at room temperature (T 0 = 26-27 • C) channelled by a silica tube (inner diameter: 3.58 ± 0.02 mm, 90 • and 3 mm above the surface) for 20 s. After quenching, the specimen was cooled up to room temperature and examined for crack extension from the original indentation crack.…”
Section: Mechanical and Thermal Shock Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both C and F materials were tested in specific mechanical and thermal shock conditions, which produced similar equibiaxial stress distributions on the surface of the disk. [5][6][7] Namely, the fracture strength was evaluated in biaxial flexure, employing a ball on discontinuous ring fixture (ball diameter, 8.04 Ϯ 0.02 mm; ring diameter, 19.50 Ϯ 0.1 mm) in a servohydraulic testing machine (Model 8502, Instron Corp., Danvers, MA) at a displacement rate of 0.05 mm/min. The fracture strengths ( F ) were higher for the C specimens (296 Ϯ 59 MPa (fifteen specimens)) than for the F specimens (220 Ϯ 66 MPa (twenty specimens)).…”
Section: (3) Mechanical and Thermal Shock Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In thermal shock condition, each specimen was suddenly cooled using a high-velocity air jet at room temperature (20 s) until cracking was detected. 7 The air was channeled onto the center of the machined surface of the disk using a silica tube (tube diameter/disk diameter ϭ 0.1). The thermal shock resistance ⌬T C 7 determined was higher for the F disks (916 Ϯ 90°C (20 specimens)) than for the C disks (765 Ϯ 88°C (eleven specimens)).…”
Section: (3) Mechanical and Thermal Shock Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods have been proposed [1][2][3][4][5][6] and the results are directly related to the method used. In order to overcome this inconvenience, an international agreement has established a conventional standardized method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%