1990
DOI: 10.2307/2786959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altruism in Drunk Driving Situations: Personal and Situational Factors in Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the model was initially developed to understand how people respond in emergencies that require immediate assistance, aspects of the model have been successfully applied to many other situations, ranging from preventing someone from driving drunk to making a decision about whether to donate a kidney to a relative (Borgida, Conner, & Manteufel, 1992;Rabow, Newcomb, Monto, & Hernandez, 1990).…”
Section: A Decision Model Of Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the model was initially developed to understand how people respond in emergencies that require immediate assistance, aspects of the model have been successfully applied to many other situations, ranging from preventing someone from driving drunk to making a decision about whether to donate a kidney to a relative (Borgida, Conner, & Manteufel, 1992;Rabow, Newcomb, Monto, & Hernandez, 1990).…”
Section: A Decision Model Of Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steele et al (1985) examined the role of alcohol on helping behavior, fi nding that at low doses alcohol increased helping behavior, especially in high-confl ict situations where individuals were pressured to help others. In a self-report survey, Rabow et al (1990) determined that college students were more likely to intervene in a drunkdriving situation if they knew and liked the driver but only if the driver was evaluated to be dangerous and the participants felt able to help. Thomas and Seibold (1995) similarly found that college students were likely to intervene in drunk-driving situations when they knew the person well or when they perceived potential harm to the driver or others.…”
Section: Helping Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers consistently report that at least one third of the United States population has attempted such an intervention in the previous year (Rabow and Newcomb, 1992). Prior studies have shown that DUI intervention shares many cognitive characteristics with what experimental researchers have characterized as "helping behavior" or "altruism" (Rabow et al, 1990;Wolfinger, Rabow, and Newcomb, 1994). Furthermore, DUI interventions involve complex social and psychological dynamics (Gusfield, Kotarba, and Rasmussen, 1981;Newcomb et al, 1992;Hernandez et al, 1993;Turrisi et al, 1993).…”
Section: Evaluating Gilligan's Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%