2020
DOI: 10.3133/sim3453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altitude of the potentiometric surface in the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer, spring 2018

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment-visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS.For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictions were made using the final hyperparameters selected for each BRT model and a flat file of predictor variable values at each raster cell (Knierim et al 2021a). The depth represented by each raster cell (and hence depth of BRT model prediction) was the mid‐point depth of MRVA saturated thickness, calculated using the 2018 potentiometric groundwater altitude (McGuire et al 2020) and the bottom of the MRVA (Torak and Painter 2019a, 2019b). Wells used in model training may have different depths than the prediction depth of the coincident raster cell where the well is located, but BRT methods can handle this sort of complexity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predictions were made using the final hyperparameters selected for each BRT model and a flat file of predictor variable values at each raster cell (Knierim et al 2021a). The depth represented by each raster cell (and hence depth of BRT model prediction) was the mid‐point depth of MRVA saturated thickness, calculated using the 2018 potentiometric groundwater altitude (McGuire et al 2020) and the bottom of the MRVA (Torak and Painter 2019a, 2019b). Wells used in model training may have different depths than the prediction depth of the coincident raster cell where the well is located, but BRT methods can handle this sort of complexity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Location of the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer and regions associated with the Mississippi Alluvial Plain. Depth to water from 2018 calculated from McGuire et al (2020). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%