1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990903)86:1<9::aid-ajmg3>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altitude as a risk factor for congenital anomalies

Abstract: The birth prevalence of specific types of congenital anomalies at low and high altitudes in South America were compared after adjustment for prenatal growth, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The material includes all 1,668,722 consecutive births occurring in 53 hospitals participating in the Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECLAMC), having registered at least 100 malformed/control pairs between 1967 and 1995. The lowland subsample (below 2,000 m above the sea level) included … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
85
2
19

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
5
85
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Among methodological differences, the classification-whether only isolated or isolated and unclassified multiple or isolated, unclassified multiple and specified CA syndromes of microtia/anotia are evaluated-and ascertainment-whether type I/minor microtia or Facio-Auriculo-Vertebral Spectrum: FAVS is included to the group of isolated microtia/anotiaproblems need to be mentioned, beyond the differences in the completeness of ascertainment and the quality of diagnoses. However, population characteristics are also important: microtia/anotia is relatively rare in white and black people, more frequent in Hispanics, mainly in children born in Mexico [15] and particularly in regions within special geographical clusters of microtia/anitia as in Quito, Ecuador [14] and the Navajo Indians in the USA state of New Mexico [16], in addition to populations living in high altitudes [17]. Nevertheless, differences in ascertainment and diagnostic criteria are probably the major source of great variations in the rate of external ear CAs, mainly microtia/anotia; therefore, their comparison demands caution among interpreting data for different populations/registries/studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among methodological differences, the classification-whether only isolated or isolated and unclassified multiple or isolated, unclassified multiple and specified CA syndromes of microtia/anotia are evaluated-and ascertainment-whether type I/minor microtia or Facio-Auriculo-Vertebral Spectrum: FAVS is included to the group of isolated microtia/anotiaproblems need to be mentioned, beyond the differences in the completeness of ascertainment and the quality of diagnoses. However, population characteristics are also important: microtia/anotia is relatively rare in white and black people, more frequent in Hispanics, mainly in children born in Mexico [15] and particularly in regions within special geographical clusters of microtia/anitia as in Quito, Ecuador [14] and the Navajo Indians in the USA state of New Mexico [16], in addition to populations living in high altitudes [17]. Nevertheless, differences in ascertainment and diagnostic criteria are probably the major source of great variations in the rate of external ear CAs, mainly microtia/anotia; therefore, their comparison demands caution among interpreting data for different populations/registries/studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral clefts frequently occur in combination with a wide range of chromosomal abnormalities and syndromes (trisomy 13, amniotic band anomalad, Fryns syndrome, Meckel syndrome, Stickler syndrome, Treacher Collins syndrome, van der Woude syndrome, Velocardiofacial syndrome, etc.) [24] and environmental factors such as medication during pregnancy, maternal alcohol consumption and smoking, dietary and vitamin deficiencies, diabetes, environmental toxins, altitude, birth order, socioeconomic status, and parental age [25][26][27][28][29]. Other genetic factors that may affect the presence of OFCs include maternal ability to maintain red blood cell zinc concentrations and myoinositol concentrations (a hexahydroxycyclohexane sugar alcohol) [30].…”
Section: Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residents with Amerindian background born in three high-altitude Andean cities (between 2600 m and 3600 m) and in 38 low-altitude cities (between 5 m and 905 m) were surveyed for a number of conditions, and relatively low frequencies of anencephaly [relative risk (RR 0.33)], spina bifida (RR 0.57), hydrocephaly (RR 0.41) and pes equinovarus (RR 0.70) were found in the high altitude samples (Castilla et al 1999). Although the data were not stratified according to ethnic origin, the high frequency of aboriginal people in the high-altitude sample suggests that the difference in susceptibility to neural tube defects (NTDs) may be characteristic of these populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%