Alternatives to the impulse response h(t) to describe the acoustical behavior of conical ducts

Abstract

In unidimensional acoustical systems, the impulse response h(t) at the input section, which describes the pressure evolution originated at this section by the introduction of a flow unit impulse through it, relates pressure p(t) and flow u(t) at the input section by means of the convolution product p=h*u. If damping and radiation are small, it is interesting to find other functions of faster decay than h(t) in order to improve the convolution convergence. As alternatives to h(t), this article studies the impulse responses h′(t) and h″(t), which correspond to the modified systems that result when coupling the original acoustical system input section to a cylindrical anechoic termination and a conical anechoic termination, respectively. These functions h′(t) and h″(t) are related to the plane-wave reflection function Rp−(t) and spherical-wave reflection function Rs−(t), respectively. The comparison of these three impulse responses shows that the use of h′(t) and h″(t), though of faster decay than h(t) in principle, is not always advisable. For conical bores with small truncation, the convolution with h′(t) may lead to numerical instability more easily than that with h(t). On the other hand, the impulse response h″(t) turns out to be divergent for certain geometrical duct configurations, and thus it is useless as a kernel function in a convolution in these cases.

On the calculation of reflectance in non-uniform ear canals

“…The representation of the spherical-wave characteristic impedances in the time domain is associated with a number of problems that make them unfit for some practical applications. Previous authors (Agull o et al, 1988;…”

“…In a lossless uniform waveguide, the plane-wave characteristic impedance is a frequency-independent real-valued quantity and has convenient time-domain properties that allow it to be estimated in situ from the measured input impedance (Keefe et al, 1992;Nørgaard et al, 2017;Rasetshwane and Neely, 2011). By contrast, the characteristic impedances of non-uniform waveguides are complex-valued, depend both on frequency and on the direction of propagation, and have time-domain properties that differ considerably from the plane-wave characteristic impedance (e.g., Agull o et al, 1988). The characteristic impedances of certain acoustic horns, governed by the Webster horn equation (Webster, 1919), with independently propagating waves can be found analytically.…”

Physical Modeling Synthesis Update

“…Digital waveguide models have been derived for conical-bore instruments [53,62,70], and limited simulations have been successful. However, there is a surprising result in the theory: When a conical tube suddenly decreases in taper angle, such as when crossing from a diverging conical segment into a converging one, the impulse response of the junction actually contains growing exponentials [2]. This means that, at such a junction, the straightforward waveguide model must use unstable reflection and transmission filters!…”

On the one-dimensional acoustic propagation in conical ducts with stationary mean flow

“…However, convergent cones can only be physically extended to the apex, and any acoustic signal reaching it would necessarily be reflected. The convergent anechoic termination can either be treated analytically 16 or implemented through an active system able to cancel any impinging wave. 17 This paper proposes a direct time-domain calculation of the impulse response of anechoic conical tubes under the assumption of linear behavior, planar propagation, low Mach number, and no flow separation.…”