1987
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8116(87)90011-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternatives to information processing in consumer research New perspectives on old controversies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the researcher refrains from pre‐determining what product attributes or situational factors could influence choice behavior, which are instead seen to emerge through the personal‐historical categories of consumer experience; and these are explored and documented by the cognitive anthropologist. Context, in other words, is analyzed in relation to the enacted problem framing behaviors of the individual consumer, with the consumer viewed less like the linear computer chip model that Belk (1987) finds so unappealing, and more like introspective experience tells us consumers act namely, as “an active, if less precise, interpreter of his environment” (Nakamoto, 1987, p. 25). This is because “tool usage” is, quite naturally, contingent upon both the information processing and problem‐solving ability of the individual, and the material availability of the tools in a specific task context.…”
Section: Traditional Approaches To Context In Consumer Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the researcher refrains from pre‐determining what product attributes or situational factors could influence choice behavior, which are instead seen to emerge through the personal‐historical categories of consumer experience; and these are explored and documented by the cognitive anthropologist. Context, in other words, is analyzed in relation to the enacted problem framing behaviors of the individual consumer, with the consumer viewed less like the linear computer chip model that Belk (1987) finds so unappealing, and more like introspective experience tells us consumers act namely, as “an active, if less precise, interpreter of his environment” (Nakamoto, 1987, p. 25). This is because “tool usage” is, quite naturally, contingent upon both the information processing and problem‐solving ability of the individual, and the material availability of the tools in a specific task context.…”
Section: Traditional Approaches To Context In Consumer Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acknowledged partiality of an approach which sees the consumer as a boundedly rational, but nonetheless conscious and analytical problem solver, has focused the attention on the identification of the basic cognitive structures which shape preferences, attitudes, and in turn consumption behavior, according to an approach which may be loosely defined as WRSGRZQ, in contrast with the piecemeal, ERWWRPXS approach of the information processing view. According to the top-down view, problem solving in general and decision making in particular is tightly linked to higher-level knowledge structures and frames that shape the entire perception of the task and subsequent "performance" (Gardner, (1985); see, e.g., Nakamoto, (1987), for a discussion of these different approaches to consumer research). The key feature is that such link cannot be entirely reduced to some computational and analytical encoding procedure, but, on the contrary, it is at least partly "holistic" and "global" in nature (see, e.g., Cohen and Basu, (1987)).…”
Section: Schemas and Scriptsmentioning
confidence: 99%