Alternative work schedule interventions in the Australian construction industry: a comparative case study analysis

Abstract

Project-based construction workers in the Australian construction industry work long and irregular hours and experience higher levels of work-to-family conflict and burnout than office-based workers, giving rise to an interest in alternative work schedules as a means of supporting work-life balance. Alternative work schedules were implemented in four case study construction projects in Australia. Interventions differed between projects, with two implementing a compressed work week, and the others introducing reduced hours schedules (one of which was optional). Data were collected from each case study project, using various combinations of focus groups, surveys, interviews and daily diary collection methods. The results were mixed. The compressed work week appears to have been favourably received where it was introduced. However, waged workers still expressed concerns about the impact on their weekly 'take-home' pay. Attempts to reduce work hours by changing from a six- to a five-day schedule (without extending the length of the working day between Monday and Friday) were less favourably received. Waged workers, in particular, did not favour reduced hours schedules. The results confirm the existence of two distinct labour markets operating in the Australian construction industry and markedly different responses to alternative work schedules, based upon whether workers are waged or salaried. The results clearly show that attempts to improve work-life balance must take the structural characteristics of the industry's labour markets into consideration in the design of interventions. The impact of alternative work schedules is likely to be moderated by institutional working time regimes within the construction industry.Work hours, alternative work schedules, work-life balance, labour market characteristics,

Work-Family Conflict in Construction: Case for a Finer-Grained Analysis

“…office based, managerial or professional) construction industry workers are not preferred by waged (i.e. blue collar) construction workers, especially as these relate to the adoption of alternative work schedules (Lingard, Townsend, Bradley & Brown, 2008). While salaried workers prefer a reduction in weekly work hours and/or the elimination of Saturday work, these initiatives potentially reduce the weekly take-home pay of waged workers who are paid higher rates for hours worked above a weekly standard number of hours and work performed at the weekend.…”

Association between perceived union connection and upper body musculoskeletal pains among unionized construction apprentices

“…These results imply that perceived union connection could influence apprentices' lives beyond the workplace. Difficulty in doing home activities could be a contributing factor to poor work-life balance among construction workers, whom studies have shown to be more vulnerable to work-life issues due to long and irregular work hours and inflexible work schedules [Lingard and Francis, 2006;Lingard et al, 2008]. Difficulty in job activities could be associated with inefficient work performance, which could lead to low productivity.…”

An Empirical Study on Human Resources Management in Construction Department of Epc Contractors in Petroleum Industries

“…The method of management of human resources can have important effects on each individual department of an EPC contractor as any functional organization (Lingard et al 2008). In petroleum megaprojects, where combining multiple stages of the project is really complicated, forecasting of effectiveness in human resources management plans can be lead to save of time and costs in a high scale.…”