Alternative Technologies for Mobile Direct-View Displays

Kimmel, Jyrki

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79567-4_122

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, such technology is commercially available on laptops (e.g., Toshiba 'Qosmio F750, F755, and X770'; Sharp 'Actius RD3D'), smart phones (e.g., HTC EVO 3D), and game consoles (e.g., Nintendo 3DS). However, such devices along with portable 3D display technology in general are still in their infancy and remain an area of ongoing development (Boev & Gotchev, 2013;Fattal et al, 2013;Harrold & Woodgate, 2007;Kimmel, 2012;Ogniewski & Ragnemalm, 2011;Travis, 2008; e.g., MOBILE3DTV, IEE, Hitachi, Mas-terImage 3D). For ATS mobile devices in particular, several technical challenges such as miniaturization and bandwidth issues still need to be addressed (Dodgson, 2013;Su et al, 2011).…”

Section: Time-multiplexed Techniques -Liquid Crystal Shutter Gogglesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dichoptic Viewing Methods for Binocular Rivalry Research: Prospects for Large-Scale Clinical and Genetic Studies

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Binocular rivalry (BR) is an intriguing phenomenon that occurs when two different images are presented, one to each eye, resulting in alternation or rivalry between the percepts. The phenomenon has been studied for nearly 200 years, with renewed and intensive investigation over recent decades. The rate of perceptual switching has long been known to vary widely between individuals but to be relatively stable within individuals. A recent twin study demonstrated that individual variation in BR rate is under substantial genetic control, a finding that also represented the first report, using a large study, of genetic contribution for any post-retinal visual processing phenomenon. The twin study had been prompted by earlier work showing BR rate was slow in the heritable psychiatric condition, bipolar disorder (BD). Together, these studies suggested that slow BR may represent an endophenotype for BD, and heralded the advent of modern clinical and genetic studies of rivalry. This new focus has coincided with rapid advances in 3D display technology, but despite such progress, specific development of technology for rivalry research has been lacking. This review therefore compares different display methods for BR research across several factors, including viewing parameters, image quality, equipment cost, compatibility with other investigative methods, subject group, and sample size, with a focus on requirements specific to large-scale clinical and genetic studies. It is intended to be a resource for investigators new to BR research, such as clinicians and geneticists, and to stimulate the development of 3D display technology for advancing interdisciplinary studies of rivalry.

show abstract