2016
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2016.11777420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Student-Based Revenue Streams for Higher Education Institutions: A Difference-in-Difference Analysis Using Guaranteed Tuition Policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If increasing tuition is not an option for public colleges and universities, they may increase their fees as an alternative method to generate revenue (Kelchen, 2016). Focusing on public institutions in the state of Illinois, Delaney and Kearney (2016) found consistent evidence that guaranteed tuition policies led to significant increases in in-state fees. Given the growing prevalence of institutional decisions to increase student fees in lieu of tuition to enhance revenue, this study considers both tuition and fees as a proxy for the price of college.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…If increasing tuition is not an option for public colleges and universities, they may increase their fees as an alternative method to generate revenue (Kelchen, 2016). Focusing on public institutions in the state of Illinois, Delaney and Kearney (2016) found consistent evidence that guaranteed tuition policies led to significant increases in in-state fees. Given the growing prevalence of institutional decisions to increase student fees in lieu of tuition to enhance revenue, this study considers both tuition and fees as a proxy for the price of college.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…RDT has also been used to explain policy and higher education trends (Delaney & Kearney, 2016;Mendoza & Berger, 2008;Pfeffer & Salancik, 2003). Political action is one of the tactics enacted by organizations to minimize external influence (Pfeffer & Salancik, 2003).…”
Section: Resource Dependence Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For community colleges, state and local funding often takes up to half of their total operating revenue (Romano and Palmer 2016). Researchers have examined how state policies could influence tuition levels (Delaney and Kearney 2016;Kramer et al 2017;Nicholson-Crotty and Meier 2003;Serna 2013;Serna and Harris 2014). Specifically, if institutions are provided with tuition-setting authority, it is assumed that tuition levels will increase as institutional administrators set tuition and fees (Kim and Ko 2015;Lowry 2000).…”
Section: Tuition-setting Strategy and Student Educational Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mumper and Freeman (2011) indicated that many economic, social, and political factors can contribute to increasing tuition levels, including decreasing state appropriations, increasing campus expenditures, and changing enrollment patterns. Specifically, tuition levels can be influenced by state policies (Delaney and Kearney 2016;Nicholson-Crotty and Meier 2003;Serna 2013;Serna and Harris 2014). In 2010, the state of Louisiana passed legislation linking public institutions' performance to 15% of state base appropriations and the authority to increase annual tuition and fees between 5% and 10% without legislative approval (State of Louisiana Board of Regents [LA BoR] 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%