2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

13
1,213
0
24

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,361 publications
(1,259 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
13
1,213
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal of introduced species may alleviate their impact on resource competition above and below ground, but if their soil conditioning legacies continue, they may impede successful site restoration (Suding, Gross, & Houseman, 2004; Suding & Hobbs, 2009; Yelenik & Levine, 2010). Furthermore, recent studies establish the importance of genotypes and plant functional traits as strong influences on soil biota (van der Putten et al., 2013), and their effect on associated consumers, such as amphibians (Martin & Blossey, 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of introduced species may alleviate their impact on resource competition above and below ground, but if their soil conditioning legacies continue, they may impede successful site restoration (Suding, Gross, & Houseman, 2004; Suding & Hobbs, 2009; Yelenik & Levine, 2010). Furthermore, recent studies establish the importance of genotypes and plant functional traits as strong influences on soil biota (van der Putten et al., 2013), and their effect on associated consumers, such as amphibians (Martin & Blossey, 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, restoration should not prioritize a fixed successional trajectory to reach a final product of succession, but rather should aim to induce the process of succession to reach the final product of establishing multiple stable communities (Young et al, 2001). Hence, restoration methodologies should incorporate a variety of ecological perspectives and references in the practice of enabling restoration to be part of a continuous dynamic process, considering several critical constraints imposed by ecosystem dynamics such as catastrophic shifts, thresholds, and alternative stable states (Scheffer et al, 2001;Suding et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a push to explore the implications of these studies on a larger scale and developing comprehensive tools for restoration ((Hobbs et al 1996, Suding et al 2004, PiekarskaStachowiak et al 2014. It has also been recognized that restoration ecology studies differ than more traditional ecology studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%