2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative splicing of mutually exclusive exons—A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
56
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
2
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many other studies have also revealed that specific subsets of exonic splicing silencers exert distinct effects on a multifunctional intron retention reporter, and that one of these subsets is the most likely to be involved in the regulation of endogenous intron retention events. Intron retention could, therefore, affect alternative NA not available a p-Values were calculated from the two-sided χ 2 test; genotype frequency in the lower concentration group vs. in the normal concentration group b p-Values were calculated from the two-sided χ 2 test; genotype frequency in the higher concentration group vs. in the normal concentration group c Considering heterozygotes and homozygotes together splicing of pre-mRNA by influencing the exonic splicing silencers, thus producing different mature mRNAs and then translating proteins with different functions [36][37][38]. Therefore, in the present study, we selected SNPs associated with the voriconazole concentration from the statistical perspective; these SNPs may also have an impact on protein function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other studies have also revealed that specific subsets of exonic splicing silencers exert distinct effects on a multifunctional intron retention reporter, and that one of these subsets is the most likely to be involved in the regulation of endogenous intron retention events. Intron retention could, therefore, affect alternative NA not available a p-Values were calculated from the two-sided χ 2 test; genotype frequency in the lower concentration group vs. in the normal concentration group b p-Values were calculated from the two-sided χ 2 test; genotype frequency in the higher concentration group vs. in the normal concentration group c Considering heterozygotes and homozygotes together splicing of pre-mRNA by influencing the exonic splicing silencers, thus producing different mature mRNAs and then translating proteins with different functions [36][37][38]. Therefore, in the present study, we selected SNPs associated with the voriconazole concentration from the statistical perspective; these SNPs may also have an impact on protein function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this pattern indicates that the ancestral state (before duplication and subfunctionalization) included mutually exclusive exons or alternative 3 ′ or 5 ′ splice sites. We chose not to study these other types of alternative splicing because cassette exons represent the most common form of alternative splicing (Sorek et al 2004;Pohl et al 2013) and because detecting subfunctionalization of alternative 3 ′ and 5 ′ splice sites, as well as mutually exclusive exons, is computationally very difficult. By omitting other types of alternative splicing events, our estimates of the effects of subfunctionalization are likely conservative, meaning that gene duplication may reduce alternative splicing levels even more than reported here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five types of alternative splicing have been identified to contribute to most mRNA isoforms, which are differential exon inclusion (exon skipping), intron retention, alternative 5′ and 3′ exon splicing, and mutually exclusive splicing (Blencowe, 2006; Pan et al , 2008; Wang et al , 2008; Nilsen & Graveley, 2010). Mutually exclusive splicing generates alternative isoforms by retaining only one exon of a cluster of neighbouring internal exons in the mature transcript and is a sophisticated way to modulate protein function (Letunic et al , 2002; Meijers et al , 2007; Pohl et al , 2013; Tress et al , 2017a). The most extreme cases known so far are the arthropod DSCAM genes, for which up to 99 mutually exclusive exons (MXEs) spread into four clusters were identified (Schmucker et al , 2000; Lee et al , 2010; Pillmann et al , 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%