2004
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0307952100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative splicing generates an isoform of the human Sef gene with altered subcellular localization and specificity

Abstract: Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) control a multitude of biological processes and are therefore subjected to multiple levels of regulation. Negative feedback is one of the mechanisms that provide an effective means to control RTK-mediated signaling. Sef has recently been identified as a specific antagonist of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in zebrafish and subsequently in mouse and human. Sef encodes a putative type I transmembrane protein that antagonizes the Ras͞mitogen-activated protein kinase path… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
94
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This growth factor is abundant in small capillaries in the CL, where it can activate FGF-receptor signaling in the endothelial cells. The reported ability of SEF to regulate FGF2 action (Kovalenko et al 2003, Preger et al 2004, Ziv et al 2006, Zisman-Rozen et al 2007) and the present finding that Sef expression is restricted to endothelial cells in the CL point to the existence of counter-regulatory mechanisms that prevent growth factor-induced SEF expression in the GLC. One such plausible mechanism might involve Spry2, which contrary to SEF is expressed in GLC in both human and rodent ovaries (Haimov-Kochman et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This growth factor is abundant in small capillaries in the CL, where it can activate FGF-receptor signaling in the endothelial cells. The reported ability of SEF to regulate FGF2 action (Kovalenko et al 2003, Preger et al 2004, Ziv et al 2006, Zisman-Rozen et al 2007) and the present finding that Sef expression is restricted to endothelial cells in the CL point to the existence of counter-regulatory mechanisms that prevent growth factor-induced SEF expression in the GLC. One such plausible mechanism might involve Spry2, which contrary to SEF is expressed in GLC in both human and rodent ovaries (Haimov-Kochman et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Within the human reproductive system, SEF transcripts were detected in testes, ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), and mammary and prostate epithelium (Preger et al 2004, Zisman-Rozen et al 2007. SEF expression is downregulated in ovarian, breast and prostate carcinomas in a manner that correlates with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis, underscoring its role as a tumor suppressor (Darby et al 2006, Zisman-Rozen et al 2007, Murphy et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fulllength Sef is predicted to contain a signal peptide and transmembrane domain and is ubiquitously expressed in human tissues. The short isoform is thought to be primarily cytosolic and has a more restricted pattern of expression (Preger et al, 2004). Both human isoforms have been shown to inhibit RTK signalling in cell line models Ziv et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, Sef has been reported to be an antagonist of FGF signaling and to regulate Ras/MAPK signaling at different levels in vertebrates [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Evidence has been provided that heterozygous expression of Sef inhibits FGF signaling, but that underexpression of Sef leads to too much signaling, causing characteristic malformations in zebrafish embryos [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%