2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention to improve understory plant diversity conservation in southern Patagonian forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
28

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
43
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, removal of retained overstory during final cuts under shelterwood system could increase changes in microclimate, and then accelerate sensitive species extirpation. An indicator of gradual loss could be the decreasing in relative abundance of species (e.g., Uncinia lechleriana) or groups (mosses and ferns), both showed as sensitive entities in other studies too (Lencinas et al, 2008b(Lencinas et al, , 2011. Increasing in moss cover in RH-L (when general trend is to diminish with harvesting) could be explained by quickly establishment of bryophyte early-succesional species, similarly to the observed by Ruokolainen and Salo (2006) in Finnish forest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, removal of retained overstory during final cuts under shelterwood system could increase changes in microclimate, and then accelerate sensitive species extirpation. An indicator of gradual loss could be the decreasing in relative abundance of species (e.g., Uncinia lechleriana) or groups (mosses and ferns), both showed as sensitive entities in other studies too (Lencinas et al, 2008b(Lencinas et al, , 2011. Increasing in moss cover in RH-L (when general trend is to diminish with harvesting) could be explained by quickly establishment of bryophyte early-succesional species, similarly to the observed by Ruokolainen and Salo (2006) in Finnish forest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The introduction of species occurs from associated environments (grasslands, peat-lands and Nothofagus antarctica (Forster f.) Oersted forests, as was described by Lencinas et al, 2008a), and then they remain in the system along the complete forest cycle (Martínez Pastur et al, 2002). Ecological modifications can favor native and exotic understory plant species, previously present in primary forest or not, which improves growth and could produce more than two fold greater cover in open forests compared to closed stands (Lencinas et al, 2011). Some exotic species (A. stolonifera, C. fontanum, P. pratensis, R. acetosella and V. serpyllifolia) are naturalized and grow freely in both disturbed and undisturbed communities (Moore, 1983), due to their ability to disperse and acclimatize.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary, in the southernmost island conditions, understory composition and structure of mixed deciduous-evergreen Nothofagus forests have been little explored (Promis et al 2008) compared to pure Nothofagus forests. Many researches in N. pumilio were developed studying natural unmanaged and several anthropogenic impacted forests (e.g., Martínez Pastur et al 2002;Lencinas et al 2008aLencinas et al , 2008bLencinas et al , 2011, but pure N. betuloides forests have received fewer attention. Both pure forest types usually develop a sparse and short understory layer (less than 1 m tall), mainly conformed by herbaceous and moss species (Moore 1983;Matteri and Schiavone 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the biotic changes, the dynamic of the understory (e.g. Lencinas et al, 2011;Gallo et al, 2013) and the herbivore grazing , are the factors with greater influence; and among the abiotic changes, the climate extreme events could be considered as the most influent (e.g. Curran et al, 1999;Schauber et al, 2002;James, 2011).…”
Section: Seed Production and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%