2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative model structure with simplistic noise model to identify linear time invariant systems subjected to non-stationary disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When performing an identification test for a sampled system with time delay subject to load disturbance and measurement noise, the output response can be generally described by the following discrete-time OE model with an integer type delay parameter, The identification objective is to estimate the above OE model parameters including an integer delay from sampled data, with a prior knowledge or assumption on the orders of a n and b n for model fitting. For unknown system dynamics, the optimal model order may be determined by using the Akaike information criterion (AIC), a hypothesis testing condition [14], or a cross-correlation function between the input and the univariate residual sequence [19], so as to check if a higher order model could result in better fitting in terms of the parsimony principle on the number of model parameters.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When performing an identification test for a sampled system with time delay subject to load disturbance and measurement noise, the output response can be generally described by the following discrete-time OE model with an integer type delay parameter, The identification objective is to estimate the above OE model parameters including an integer delay from sampled data, with a prior knowledge or assumption on the orders of a n and b n for model fitting. For unknown system dynamics, the optimal model order may be determined by using the Akaike information criterion (AIC), a hypothesis testing condition [14], or a cross-correlation function between the input and the univariate residual sequence [19], so as to check if a higher order model could result in better fitting in terms of the parsimony principle on the number of model parameters.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A refined instrumental variable (RIV) approach was recently developed by using a unified operator to estimate the Box-Jenkins model [18]. For the presence of non-stationary disturbance, a bias compensation identification algorithm [19] was given to obtain an extended ARMAX or OE model with good accuracy, by using a variable forgetting factor to estimate the model parameters and disturbance. For time delay systems, only a few papers presented discrete-time domain identification methods for obtaining an OE model with an integer type delay parameter, due to the difficulties for identifying the linear model parameters together with an integer type delay parameter that involves mixed-integer programming, which was recognized to be a non-convex problem for parameter estimation [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, a sluggish tuning produces a slowly-varying input, which is less exciting for the process, and possibly less informative for any identification procedure. The impact of controller tuning has already been studied by [27], for the identification of a pure linear dynamics without considering the problem of valve stiction. In addition, the same authors ( [17], Chp.…”
Section: Effect Of Controller Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is robust, but obviously heavy in terms of computational load. Among other standard solutions to estimate the time delay, [22] and [27] have proposed a cross correlation analysis between the input (MV) and the output (PV) sequence. Additional simulations with unknown process time delay have showed that t d has no significant impact on the identification methods.…”
Section: Effect Of Controller Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation