1985
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(85)90139-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
687
0
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 988 publications
(720 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
687
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…GIM (2010) employ a different approach, i.e., the instrumental variable to address the endogeneity problem. Heckman and Robb (1985) and Moffitt (1999) suggest the instrumental variable (IV) 357 Corporate Governance and Firm Value method, which focuses on finding a variable (or variables) that influences the CSR choice, but does not influence Tobin's q (and thus is not correlated with the random error term in the Tobin's q equation). Angrist (2000) asserts that the IV method works even when the second-stage model is nonlinear, if the researcher focuses on the causal effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIM (2010) employ a different approach, i.e., the instrumental variable to address the endogeneity problem. Heckman and Robb (1985) and Moffitt (1999) suggest the instrumental variable (IV) 357 Corporate Governance and Firm Value method, which focuses on finding a variable (or variables) that influences the CSR choice, but does not influence Tobin's q (and thus is not correlated with the random error term in the Tobin's q equation). Angrist (2000) asserts that the IV method works even when the second-stage model is nonlinear, if the researcher focuses on the causal effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSR firms that are identified in our sample may not be representative of all firms for the relation between governance structure and firm value/performance. 9 Although it is not possible to correct for both endogenous treatment effects and selection bias at the same time, in order to solve the selection bias problem, Heckman and Robb (1985) and Moffitt (1999) suggest the IV method, which focuses on finding a variable (or variables) that influences the CSR choice, but does not influence Tobin's q or ROA (and thus is not correlated with the random error term in the second-stage equation). In our case, our choice of an IV is FIRMAGE, which is highly correlated with CSR engagement, but is uncorrelated with industry-adjusted Tobin's q or ROA (unreported correlation coefficient is 0.01).…”
Section: Endogenous Treatment Effects and The Instrumental Variables mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selon Deaton (1985), Browning, Deaton et Irish (1985) et Heckman et Robb (1985), les enquêtes qui fournissent chaque année des échantillons aléatoires d'une même population -comme l'Enquête sur les finances des consommateurs de Statistique Canada -permettent de créer des données de type panel et d'estimer avec efficacité des modèles linéaires dotés de caractéristiques dynamiques. Plus récemment, Moffitt (1990Moffitt ( , 1993 a démontré que cette stratégie d'estimation pouvait aussi être appliquée aux modèles avec variables dépendantes discrètes.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified