Abstract:Membrane fouling is caused by foulant deposition or adsorption through physical or chemical interactions on the membrane surface, causing the reduction of flux through the membrane. The main drawbacks of chemical agents used for cleaning are cost, damage caused on the membrane, and waste stream making the process unattractive. Alternative, methods such as ultrasound, enzymatic process, and osmotic backwashing were explored for membrane cleaning. Among all mentioned methods, micronanobubbles have been reported … Show more
“…NaClO is the most used oxidant for membrane cleaning and removes both organic and biological foulants via oxidation and disinfection (Terán-Hilares et al, 2022), and enhances the detachment of organic molecules from the membrane by increasing their hydrophilicity. With ceramic membranes, Song et al (2016) showed that permeate flux can be restored using NaOH at 70 ± 1°C which hydrolyses colloids into fine particles, and organic matter into small molecules.…”
Section: Physicochemical and Chemical Cleaningmentioning
Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) are a recent development in wastewater treatment driven by concerns about energy use and sludge disposal. It separates hydraulic retention time from solid retention time enabling short retention times (as low as 3–6 h, but normally 12–24 h), and excellent performance (85–95% chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, no effluent solids and high bacterial/virus removal). It produces low-sludge yields (0.04–0.12 g sludge/g CODrem), and methane in both the gas and dissolved in the effluent (lower temperatures yield higher soluble methane). It can be net energy positive depending on its configuration, for example, using ‘dynamic membranes’, mechanically shaken membrane or a two-stage granular activated carbon (GAC) bed reactor. However, membranes ranging from ultrafiltration (0.04 μm) to microfiltration (0.4 μm) foul quite quickly, with Soluble Microbial Products (SMPs)/Extra Cellular Polymers (ECPs-which include extracellular polysaccharides) and cells depositing and growing on the surface. At a certain cell density Quorum Sensing (QS) occurs and there is a rapid increase in trans-membrane pressure (‘TMP jump’). Fouling can be ameliorated by managed gas sparging, mechanical shaking, addition of flocculants/adsorbents, for example, powdered activated carbon, or quorum quenching. Nevertheless, some fouling is important as it enhances membrane performance. Due to the membrane rejecting cells and many low molecular weight solutes, AnMBRs tolerate shock loads and toxins well, and enable microbial adaptation to occur. However, to improve performance more research is needed to minimize overall energy use, explore enhanced performance with bioaugmentation, enhance rates of solid hydrolysis, optimize its performance in the overall flowsheet (global optimization), use life-cycle analysis to reduce its environmental impact, control sulphate reduction and improve post-treatment of effluents to enable water recycling.
“…NaClO is the most used oxidant for membrane cleaning and removes both organic and biological foulants via oxidation and disinfection (Terán-Hilares et al, 2022), and enhances the detachment of organic molecules from the membrane by increasing their hydrophilicity. With ceramic membranes, Song et al (2016) showed that permeate flux can be restored using NaOH at 70 ± 1°C which hydrolyses colloids into fine particles, and organic matter into small molecules.…”
Section: Physicochemical and Chemical Cleaningmentioning
Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) are a recent development in wastewater treatment driven by concerns about energy use and sludge disposal. It separates hydraulic retention time from solid retention time enabling short retention times (as low as 3–6 h, but normally 12–24 h), and excellent performance (85–95% chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, no effluent solids and high bacterial/virus removal). It produces low-sludge yields (0.04–0.12 g sludge/g CODrem), and methane in both the gas and dissolved in the effluent (lower temperatures yield higher soluble methane). It can be net energy positive depending on its configuration, for example, using ‘dynamic membranes’, mechanically shaken membrane or a two-stage granular activated carbon (GAC) bed reactor. However, membranes ranging from ultrafiltration (0.04 μm) to microfiltration (0.4 μm) foul quite quickly, with Soluble Microbial Products (SMPs)/Extra Cellular Polymers (ECPs-which include extracellular polysaccharides) and cells depositing and growing on the surface. At a certain cell density Quorum Sensing (QS) occurs and there is a rapid increase in trans-membrane pressure (‘TMP jump’). Fouling can be ameliorated by managed gas sparging, mechanical shaking, addition of flocculants/adsorbents, for example, powdered activated carbon, or quorum quenching. Nevertheless, some fouling is important as it enhances membrane performance. Due to the membrane rejecting cells and many low molecular weight solutes, AnMBRs tolerate shock loads and toxins well, and enable microbial adaptation to occur. However, to improve performance more research is needed to minimize overall energy use, explore enhanced performance with bioaugmentation, enhance rates of solid hydrolysis, optimize its performance in the overall flowsheet (global optimization), use life-cycle analysis to reduce its environmental impact, control sulphate reduction and improve post-treatment of effluents to enable water recycling.
“…NaClO is the most used oxidant employed for membrane cleaning. It allows for the removal of organic and biological foulants via oxidation and disinfection processes [68,69]. It may degrade functional groups of natural organic matter (NOM) into ketonic, carbonyl, and aldehyde groups, leading to their hydrolysis at high pH levels [144].…”
Section: Physio-chemical and Chemical Cleaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, the methods of membrane cleaning are categorized into three groups: chemical, physical, and physio-chemical. It should be emphasized that physical cleaning is adopted to remove reversible fouling while chemical cleaning to remove irreversible fouling [26,68,69].…”
In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in developing the potential of anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs). The present paper presents a comprehensive review of studies focused on biogas production via the treatment of municipal and domestic wastewater with the use of such technology. The main aim of the current work was to evaluate the impact of operating parameters on the biogas production yield. Moreover, the possibilities of applying various fouling mitigation strategies have been discussed in detail. Analyses have been performed and reported in the literature, which were conducted with the use of submerged and external AnMBRs equipped with both polymeric and ceramic membranes. It has been shown that, so far, the impact of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) on biogas yield is ambiguous. This finding indicates that future studies on this issue are required. In addition, it was demonstrated that temperature has a positive impact on process performance. However, as presented in the literature, investigations have been carried out mainly under psychrophilic and mesophilic conditions. Hence, performing further experimental studies at temperatures above 40 °C is highly recommended. Moreover, it has been shown that in order to restore the initial permeate flux, a combination of several membrane cleaning methods is often required. The findings presented in the current study may be particularly important for the determination of operating conditions and suitable fouling mitigation strategies for laboratory-scale and pilot-scale AnMBRs used for biogas production via the treatment of municipal and domestic conditions.
“…Membrane fouling can be avoided by regular cleaning with chemicals such as sodium hypochlorite or NaOH. However, the more frequently a membrane is cleaned with chemicals, the shorter its life-span [15,22,34].…”
Dragon blood resin (DBR) is an effective bio-based additive for polymeric membrane fabrication. Despite the improved permeability and antifouling properties of the resulting membrane provided by DBR, its weak chemical bond makes it susceptibleto leaching during both fabrication and operation rendering the membrane properties and performances. This study investigates the chemical stability and leaching behavior of polyethersulfone (PES) membranes modi ed with DBR in an alkaline solution. The study involves immersing two types of PES based membranes, one loaded with 3% DBR (M-3) during the fabrication and one without (M-0), in a 0.01 N NaOH solution for ve days. The results show that M-0 had good resistance to high alkaline solution, while M-3 was less stable. The pure water permeability of M-3 increased signi cantly with immersion time, as well as its surface hydrophilicity. The leaching of DBR from PES membrane matric can be ascribed by its alkali lysis polarity and the breaking of the DBR bonds from reaction of hydroxide ions with the ester bonds and glycosidic linkages in the avonoids and anthocyanins, causing them to break apart into smaller molecules. The leaching of DBR also left pores that enhanced the membrane pore size. Overall, these ndings provide useful information for the optimal design of a bio-based PES membrane.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.