2014
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative mating tactics in the yellow dung fly: resolving mechanisms of small-male advantage off pasture

Abstract: Recent work suggests that the yellow dung fly mating system may include alternative patroller-competitor mating tactics in which large males compete for gravid females on dung, whereas small, non-competitive males search for females at foraging sites. Small males obtain most matings off pasture, yet the behavioural mechanism(s) giving rise to this pattern are unknown. We investigated the male and female behaviours that determine mating success in this environment by conducting field mating experiments and foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study joins a growing body of work showing that large male body size does not increase reproductive fitness, either because size appears not to matter (e.g., Charlwood et al 2002;Lappin and Husak 2005;Rashed and Polak 2009;Fan et al 2013;Clark et al 2014) or that small males have an advantage (e.g., Pilastro et al 1997;Schneider et al 2000;Watt et al 2011;Gress et al 2014). Indeed, the advantages of traits that have long thought to be the result of evolution by sexual selection (e.g., body size, success in contests, resource-holding potential, etc.)…”
Section: Page 11 Of 28supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our study joins a growing body of work showing that large male body size does not increase reproductive fitness, either because size appears not to matter (e.g., Charlwood et al 2002;Lappin and Husak 2005;Rashed and Polak 2009;Fan et al 2013;Clark et al 2014) or that small males have an advantage (e.g., Pilastro et al 1997;Schneider et al 2000;Watt et al 2011;Gress et al 2014). Indeed, the advantages of traits that have long thought to be the result of evolution by sexual selection (e.g., body size, success in contests, resource-holding potential, etc.)…”
Section: Page 11 Of 28supporting
confidence: 76%
“…In S. stercoraria sexual competition on dung (their breeding substrate) is usually intense but variable, which is largely responsible for the male-biased size dimorphism in this species (Borgia 1981;Jann et al 2000;Ding and Blanckenhorn 2002). Alternative mating tactics of small-sized males off the dung, however, also exist in nature (Pitnick et al 2009;Gress et al 2014). Therefore, spatially and temporally varying sexual selection regimes on male body size probably have contributed to the sexual wing shape dimorphism in S. stercoraria by way of allometric scaling, explaining the correlation between wing shape and size dimorphism found here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…; Gress et al. ). Therefore, spatially and temporally varying sexual selection regimes on male body size probably have contributed to the sexual wing shape dimorphism in S. stercoraria by way of allometric scaling, explaining the correlation between wing shape and size dimorphism found here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Gress et al reported that female yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae) appeared to preferentially mate with large males on dung, but small males at foraging sites [ 41 ]. In the present study, we found that small male P .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%