2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000143554.56897.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Materials to Acrylic Bone Cement for Delivery of Depot Antibiotics in Orthopaedic Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
120
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibiotic-loaded bone cement is the current gold standard for drug-eluting local delivery devices [16,25]. However, bone cement requires removal surgery and has the potential risk of biofilm attachment, which makes this system less than ideal [3,18,23,27,29]. Biodegradable systems offer the ability to provide extended release of therapeutic agents while being resorbable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antibiotic-loaded bone cement is the current gold standard for drug-eluting local delivery devices [16,25]. However, bone cement requires removal surgery and has the potential risk of biofilm attachment, which makes this system less than ideal [3,18,23,27,29]. Biodegradable systems offer the ability to provide extended release of therapeutic agents while being resorbable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of either amikacin or daptomycin into chitosan can possibly lead to a desirable local drug delivery system that uses the inherent properties of chitosan. The need for improved delivery of antibiotics to infected wound sites remains a challenge that faces clinicians abroad [16,23,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one report, 18 of 20 cement spacers cultured using sophisticated techniques at the time of spacer removal and final reimplantation grew resistant organisms [39]. Finally, depot methods for antibiotic delivery require extensive surgery for removal of the depot materials in cases with toxic effects of the antibiotics [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is limited by several factors. First, a common limitation of most in vitro research is the difficulty of translating in vitro studies to in vivo studies [18]. Release characteristics in an in vivo environment, especially associated with a wound, are different than antibiotic release characteristics in vitro, in which a set volume of eluate and PBS is exchanged at certain intervals [18].…”
Section: Cumulative Daptomycin Mass Released Elution Time (Days)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another, and the most common, material used for local drug delivery is polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) [5]. Although PMMA implants are not biodegradable, their removal may be necessary at times for planned staged reconstruction or late bead failure [18]. Because CaSO 4 degrades over time, the need for surgical removal is eliminated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%