Food Losses, Sustainable Postharvest and Food Technologies 2021
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821912-6.00008-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative management technologies for postharvest disease control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rise of biotechnology in the last decade has made biocontrol one of the most studied sustainable alternatives in reducing postharvest diseases by using antagonistic microorganisms against phytopathogens [14,15], which is considered a viable alternative to synthetic fungicides [16]. Among the microorganisms, yeasts stand out for their antagonistic capacity, for example, they have certain characteristics, such as genetic stability, Plants 2021, 10, 2641 2 of 12 efficacy at low concentrations; control towards different phytopathogens [17]; simple nutritional requirements; survival under adverse environmental conditions; compatibility with other chemical and physical treatments; resistance to synthetic fungicides; and absence of pathogenicity towards the host [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rise of biotechnology in the last decade has made biocontrol one of the most studied sustainable alternatives in reducing postharvest diseases by using antagonistic microorganisms against phytopathogens [14,15], which is considered a viable alternative to synthetic fungicides [16]. Among the microorganisms, yeasts stand out for their antagonistic capacity, for example, they have certain characteristics, such as genetic stability, Plants 2021, 10, 2641 2 of 12 efficacy at low concentrations; control towards different phytopathogens [17]; simple nutritional requirements; survival under adverse environmental conditions; compatibility with other chemical and physical treatments; resistance to synthetic fungicides; and absence of pathogenicity towards the host [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentre os tipos de radiação mencionados, a radiação ultravioleta C (UV-C) na faixa entre 250 a 260 nm é a mais letal, devido ao seu efeito germicida em diferentes microrganismos, como fungos, bactérias e vírus (Fallik e Elic, 2022;González-Estrada et al, 2021). Através de lâmpadas, é aplicada na esterilização de objetos, no tratamento de água e tem se destacado também nos tratamentos pós-colheita de frutas e vegetais (Pathak et al, 2018;Imaizumi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Radiação Ultravioleta C Para Controle De Doenças Pós-colheitaunclassified
“…Através de lâmpadas, é aplicada na esterilização de objetos, no tratamento de água e tem se destacado também nos tratamentos pós-colheita de frutas e vegetais (Pathak et al, 2018;Imaizumi et al, 2018). O tratamento com radiação UV-C é um método não térmico, seguro e que não deixa resíduos (González-Estrada et al, 2021;Hassan et al, 2020). O estudo realizado por Gabriel et al (2017) mostraram que a exposição à radiação UV-C (254 nm) por 40 minutos reduziu a população de Salmonella enterica em coco.…”
Section: Radiação Ultravioleta C Para Controle De Doenças Pós-colheitaunclassified