Alternative Governance Model for Historical Building Conservation in China: From Property Rights Perspective

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of urbanisation, the adaptive reuse of heritage plays a key role in achieving sustainable development, which is widely recognised by UNESCO and International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). In the process of urban renewal, unclear property rights have seriously hindered the relocation of old houses, compensation and the adaptive reuse of historical buildings, even causing a series of social contradictions, such as violence. Moreover, forced evictions and controversy in dealing with the rights of residents, particularly the so-called ‘nail households’ have attracted public attention. However, few studies have analysed the problems and countermeasures from the perspective of unclear property rights. This study focuses on analysing the unclear property rights of historical buildings to propose an Alternative Governance Model for Historical Building Conservation in China. Founded on the Coase Theorem of externalities and property rights to examine the existing complex property ownership and rights patterns of 63 historical buildings in the famous Pingjiang Historic Block in Suzhou, China, the model provides reasonable and feasible reconstruction schemes for each situation. The operation model can also provide a symbiosis of new and old building solutions for urban renewal in developing countries, which may encounter a similar challenge of urbanisation.

Critical barriers and countermeasures to urban regeneration from the stakeholder perspective: a literature review

“…Third, heritage revitalization projects could be delayed due to uncertain property rights of historical buildings (Guo N. et al, 2021) and complex interest contradictions over the "bundle of rights, " including ownership, use rights, and development rights (Hou et al, 2018;Jiang et al, 2020). Conflicts in urban heritage result from stakeholders' diverse perceptions, interests, and expectations .…”

Evaluation Study on the Ecosystem Governance of Industry–Education Integration Platform in China

“…Secondly, as rational subjects, platform participants aim to achieve their respective goal demands through the integration of industry and education. Ultimately, this boils down to the distribution of cooperation benefits and the sharing of possible risks [21]. In particular, in the distribution of cooperation benefits among participating parties, it is necessary to distribute cooperation benefits according to the relative value of innovation resources invested by participating parties.…”

Co-Ownership of Communal Intellectual Property in Perspective Support to Regional Tourism

“…In general, this wealth has long been an activity in daily practice that grows and develops as a manifestation of habits in mutual interaction in society, both internally among fellow citizens and interactions with the outside world ( Levine, 2005) Communal intellectual property, both tangible and intangible, is sometimes not realized by the economic value contained therein (Guo, et al 2021) but is only seen as a habit to meet the needs of daily life. The economic value born from the principle of economic rights attached to the concept of IPR is not maximized.…”