2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative fixation method for open femoral fractures from a damage control orthopaedics perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the common use of the Sheffield in limb reconstruction today, current literature primarily involves the use of the Sheffield in the tibia [18]. Sala et al recently illustrated clinical study in which open femoral fracture was treated with TSF in DCO perspective [17]. Has et al [9] and Lerner [11] propagated the use of external fixation as the method of choice for open fractures, as is evident in the present study as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the common use of the Sheffield in limb reconstruction today, current literature primarily involves the use of the Sheffield in the tibia [18]. Sala et al recently illustrated clinical study in which open femoral fracture was treated with TSF in DCO perspective [17]. Has et al [9] and Lerner [11] propagated the use of external fixation as the method of choice for open fractures, as is evident in the present study as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Recent evidence in literature has demonstrated good clinical outcomes and lack of complications from external fixation with severe femoral fractures [1,3,9]. Sala et al documented the effectiveness of immediate and complete definitive external fixation using Taylor spatial frames (TSF) in twelve polytrauma patients with open femoral fracture [17]. TSF is more cumbersome than the conventional Ilizarov frame, and the financial cost is comparatively high [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that this difference can be explained by the accuracy of the TSF to achieve anatomic fracture reduction with the 6 strut bars and the total residual deformity correction program. [6][7][8] External fixation in our study provided definitive stabilization in 5 Gustilo grade IIIC femoral fractures after vascular repair, achieving bone union.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Damage control external fixation was applied to 34 fractures (60%) by using a multiplanar or monolateral external fixator, and TSF was initially applied to treat 3 fractures (5%). 7 Twenty fractures (35%) underwent initial stabilization with a traction pin (skeletal traction) at the time of hospital admission. 18 The mean time interval between primary treatment and secondary TSF was 5 days (range, 1-28 days).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation