2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2019.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative energy pathways in Southern Ocean food webs: Insights from a balanced model of Prydz Bay, Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aggregation of lower trophic levels is often necessary to reduce uncertainty related to incomplete trophic information 112 . These models (Table 1) are focused on the Antarctic Peninsula where the information required to parameterise krill life stages is available, while systemspecific information for krill is unavailable for regions such as the Indian sector where few foodweb models exist 114 . Whilst E. superba are often parameterised as a separate functional group in Southern Ocean foodweb models (Table 1), the same cannot be said for biogeochemical models, where typically krill are incorporated into a large zooplankton pool 115 .…”
Section: Implications Of Declining E Superba Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregation of lower trophic levels is often necessary to reduce uncertainty related to incomplete trophic information 112 . These models (Table 1) are focused on the Antarctic Peninsula where the information required to parameterise krill life stages is available, while systemspecific information for krill is unavailable for regions such as the Indian sector where few foodweb models exist 114 . Whilst E. superba are often parameterised as a separate functional group in Southern Ocean foodweb models (Table 1), the same cannot be said for biogeochemical models, where typically krill are incorporated into a large zooplankton pool 115 .…”
Section: Implications Of Declining E Superba Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbes also decompose organic material from the whale fall, releasing large amounts of nutrients, and respired CO 2 and potentially refractory dissolved organic carbon are locked in the deep ocean for decades or even centuries (Jiao et al, 2010;Cavan et al, 2019a). Elsewhere in the Southern Ocean, such as in the central Indian sector, E. superba are important but do not dominate the ecosystem as they do in the Atlantic (Everson, 2000;McCormack et al, to be published in this research topic). Near Prydz Bay, cephalopods dominate the food web, with most carbon cycling through them to sperm whales and leopard seals (McCormack et al, 2019).…”
Section: Carbon Storage In Pelagic and Benthic Consumersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere in the Southern Ocean, such as in the central Indian sector, E. superba are important but do not dominate the ecosystem as they do in the Atlantic (Everson, 2000;McCormack et al, to be published in this research topic). Near Prydz Bay, cephalopods dominate the food web, with most carbon cycling through them to sperm whales and leopard seals (McCormack et al, 2019). This constitutes a longer food chain of at least five trophic levels: phytoplankton, copepods, krill, cephalopods and sperm whales or seals.…”
Section: Carbon Storage In Pelagic and Benthic Consumersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the Atlantic, few food web descriptions exist for East Antarctica although many studies have begun hinting at species that might be key contributors to energy flow within the Indian sector food web (McCormack et al., 2019). The shelf community off East Antarctica is generally dominated by the neritic Euphausia crystallorophias (Nicol & Raymond, 2012), which has previously been identified as an important prey species in the diets of breeding Adélie penguins (Puddicombe & Johnstone, 1988), crabeater seals (Hempel, 1985), and various whales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine ecosystem models have been, and continue to be, developed for different parts of the Southern Ocean, some of which are at much smaller spatial scales than sectors, for example, West Pacific (Ross Sea—Pinkerton et al., 2010), Indian (Prydz Bay—McCormack et al., 2019; northern Kerguelen Plateau—Subramaniam et al., 2020), Atlantic (South Georgia—Hill et al., 2012), and East Pacific (West Antarctic Peninsula—Ballerini et al., 2014; Cornejo‐Donoso & Antezana, 2008; Dahood et al., 2019; Suprenand & Ainsworth, 2017). A core component of developing these models involves representing food web interactions among species and functional groups at appropriate spatial scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%