2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01664-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative effective modality of Leipzig applicator with an electron beam for the treatment of superficial malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, during HDR-BT, the dose remains on the surface and does not penetrate deeply with optimal sparing of normal tissues due to dose concentration into the clinical target volumes (CTV) and rapid dose fall-off at target periphery [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Published studies have mainly reported standard fractionation and hypofractionated brachytherapy regimens in patients treated with HDR-BT, and the biological effective dose (BED) was often calculated due to define the total dose and dose for fractions regimen for a better local control and acceptable late and acute toxicity [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, during HDR-BT, the dose remains on the surface and does not penetrate deeply with optimal sparing of normal tissues due to dose concentration into the clinical target volumes (CTV) and rapid dose fall-off at target periphery [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Published studies have mainly reported standard fractionation and hypofractionated brachytherapy regimens in patients treated with HDR-BT, and the biological effective dose (BED) was often calculated due to define the total dose and dose for fractions regimen for a better local control and acceptable late and acute toxicity [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the other radiotherapy technique, HDR-BT might be a better therapeutic option due to essential advantages such as high radiation dose concentration into the clinical target volumes (CTV), rapid dose fall-off at target periphery, optimal sparing of normal tissues in sensitive structures, shorter treatment time, and the use of hypofractionated course [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. …”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicators are cup-shaped and tungsten shielded to limit the dose to the irradiation area and they are intended to treat surface lesions utilizing a contact treatment technique. The VLCAPP were designed on the base of the Leipzig applicators [1][2][3][4], from the same vendor, in order to overcome the principal dosimetric problems that these applicators exhibit, a very heterogeneous dose distribution in planes parallel to the skin surface. The dose distribution shows a significant penumbra reducing the useful irradiation field size of the applicators and the prescription at a depth on axis would not guarantee that the entire layer receives the intended dose.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypofractionation afforded by the superficial deposition of dose using this methodology has allowed delivery of radiation using fewer fractions with good cosmetic results. (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). The primary challenge facing the field of skin surface brachytherapy is absence of prospective trials and clinical guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%