2017
DOI: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative conduits for esophageal replacement

Abstract: Replacement of the native esophagus after esophagectomy is a problem that has challenged surgeons for over a century. Not only must the conduit be long enough to bridge the distance between the cervical esophagus and the abdomen, it must also have a reliable vascular supply and be sufficiently functional to allow for deglutition.The stomach, jejunum, and colon (right, left or transverse) have all been proposed as potential solutions.The stomach has gained favor for its length, reliable vascular supply and need… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors reported on safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of this technique, alongside the established advantages of minimally-invasive techniques, such as faster recovery, fewer respiratory complications, and minimal postoperative pain. In addition, laparoscopy can provide direct visualization of the substernal dissection (23). However, despite all the advantages of minimally-invasive laparoscopic approach, advanced tumor stage and compromised performance status are associated with higher rates of conversion to open procedure (laparotomy), as in our case (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The authors reported on safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of this technique, alongside the established advantages of minimally-invasive techniques, such as faster recovery, fewer respiratory complications, and minimal postoperative pain. In addition, laparoscopy can provide direct visualization of the substernal dissection (23). However, despite all the advantages of minimally-invasive laparoscopic approach, advanced tumor stage and compromised performance status are associated with higher rates of conversion to open procedure (laparotomy), as in our case (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Table 2. The colonic interposition could be performed by the left side, right side, and ileocolonic graft as the options for esophagectomy patients (3,(19)(20)(21)(22). Whatever the reconstruction, the quality of the colon should not be disregarded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative colonic evaluation is the crucial step in providing intraluminal mucosal information for the surgeon who is responsible for performing reconstruction operations upon this group of patients. The literature reports preoperative investigation for colonic interposition being done by colonoscopy and barium enema (20)(21)(22). CT colonoscopy is a minimally invasive technique for colonic screening while avoiding the perforation risk from the colonoscopy procedure and unsuccessful cecal intubation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the type of colic graft to perform, a preoperative study with AngioTC 3-D of the abdomen and pelvis is very useful, which has 97.1% anatomical diagnostic accuracy of the mesenteric and colic vascular blood supply 8 . The rate of complications reported include necrosis of the flap (0-14%), anastomotic leaks (0-50%), anastomotic stenosis (0-32%), respiratory complications (10-42%), postoperative mortality (0-16.7%) 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%