2013
DOI: 10.1080/09362835.2013.771557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative Assessment Portfolios for Students with Intellectual Disabilities: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research indicates that, although the benefits of portfolio assessments are considerable, teachers frequently identify problems in documenting evidence and the amount of time needed to complete the portfolio process (Stockall & Smith, 2013). Using online data systems to manage child outcome data and to store digital artifacts can address some of these problems.…”
Section: Artifacts To Include In a Pmpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates that, although the benefits of portfolio assessments are considerable, teachers frequently identify problems in documenting evidence and the amount of time needed to complete the portfolio process (Stockall & Smith, 2013). Using online data systems to manage child outcome data and to store digital artifacts can address some of these problems.…”
Section: Artifacts To Include In a Pmpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are gaps in the connections between the standards and a meaningful curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities, as teachers and administrators have noted (Stockall & Smith, 2013). The failure of a teacher to gather adequate evidence of a student's progress toward the standards further calls into question the validity of the MCAS Alternate Assessment as a single measure of student proficiency (Laitsch, 2006).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%